i m not so sure about that. i think you have some real reporting out there from experts not just analysts on television, but from actual experts at the u.n., from donald trump s own administration saying how dire this is. the u.n. said we have 12 years before complete disaster. talk to the representative of the marshall islands and he s calling it what could amount to genocide if we allow things to go as they are. the reports aren t just hey, it s going to get bad. the reports are people will die. millions and millions of people will die and i think that there s an appetite among voters out there, especially democratic voters and potentially swing voters to say, let s do something about this now because it s going to affect our future and there s real economic damage that can happen as well. billions of dollars in economic damage from crops, to deaths, to losing ocean front homes and businesses in over the next century. real quick a push back. because the 2020 election won t be a
this is actually popular and if trump thinks this will hurt us politically he s not really paying attention to the pulse of the country. this is aspirational like you said. it s not a bill. the details would have to be worked out. this is so ambitious that they d have to be worked out over decades. this is a broad, aggressive, bold agenda. it will take time to implement, but at least it shows people where the democratic party is going on the issue of climate change. david, obviously the president s team sees a re-election opening. oh, yeah. i mean, it s wide, it s huge. and it s a real big pothole for the democrats. we know the polls, 35% of the country is conservative, 35% is moderate, 26% or so liberal. but this is going in the far different direction even some of the polling shows that only it s 19%, nbc poll, 19% thinks that socialism is okay. these are americans in this country. so the point is that donald trump sees this, he s a master brander. and i believe this is a major,
talking about doing away with sanctions that s a form of collusion. ultimately it will be up to mueller to determine if there s a crime. you were questioning donald trump jr. s honesty when it came to the response to the meeting at trump tower and even the response and you talked about some blocked phone calls. blocked calls that implied he might have been talking to his father. there s been reporting that the senate intel committee has uncovered who the blocked calls were to and they were not the president. are you satisfied with that explanation? well, we haven t gotten the records yet. because republicans on the committee wouldn t allow us to. but our job, it is very important, this is not to prove the president did money laundering or the phone records will show this or that. it is to find the facts and find which ever way they cut. the people who were closest to watching father and son in the campaign, people like steve bannon have said there s zero chance that don jr. did not
the primary is the real battle. they feel like what they need to do is propose or lay out who they are or what their plans are and how president trump has not been presidential or lived up to the promises he made to the voters in the upper midwest, in pennsylvania. to the middle of the road voters. they might have an argument with that. when you look at who voted for donald trump and what s happening in macomb county, you will see there s some economic worry there that he hasn t represented them as he promised. very quickly, kimberly, you have covered elizabeth warren for a long time. the issue of her identity and this native american identity, it came up in another place that was found. it was interesting her announcement coverage. i was curious to see how much it would be part of it. the new york times didn t mention it until graph 14. politico was in the headline, in the first graph of the washington post and the washington post. is she ever going to be able to put this behi
that s where the fault line is because people of color don t like it when a person who are not a person of color try to claim to be. it s beyond the native american problem. so in that sense, she addressing it, but the more that donald trump tweets out tweets with trail in it a reference to the trail of tears you think that helps her? yes. do things that seem offensive and awful that make people uncomfortable. it becomes a trump issue and at the very least you hear democrats saying that s a trump issue i don t want to talk about this. let s not focus on that. interesting. i m going to pause here. when we come back all the president s investigations. i m going to talk to the chairman of the house intelligence committee, adam schiff. adam schiff. ielsen. and #1 in network quality according to jd power. and that s why the only network to win in all four major awards is the one more people rely on.