these four congresswomen hate america. using president trump s words verbatim. they didn t question his voraspy at all, if what he was saying was true. and they did not question that the president ran on america was not that great and said essentially saying america was in a bad place. question his own america. and he seems to have done in his campaigning and what he does now, the exact same thing he says the way they re doing it and what they re doing is bad and these women don t see that they re doing the exact same thing. they re both questioning america, which is part of the whole reason that we re here in this country. that is part of what this country is about. yeah, don, look, i vehemently disagree with the political philosophy of those four congresswomen. i think they re very extreme in their positions.
america. using president trump s words verbatim. they didn t question his voraspy at all, if what he was saying was true. and they did not question that the president ran on america was not that great and said essentially saying america was in a bad place. question his own america. and he seems to have done in his campaigning and what he does now, the exact same thing he says the way they re doing it and what they re doing is bad and these women don t see that they re doing the exact same thing. they re both questioning america, which is part of the whole reason that we re here in this country. that is part of what this country is about. yeah, don, look, i vehemently disagree with the political philosophy of those four congresswomen. i think they re very extreme in their positions. that said, we have to be able to
then 4 hours later you would think they could come up with a policy and understand why this is so crazy and not in america s national interest. for some reason, they didn t get it right at the white house. i wish him well. i hope tomorrow they ll get a better statement out. what is the diplomat community, what is the understanding how a normal white house would be expected to respond to this kind of thing? if as you say, you re being generous here, you expect the white house might eventually find their way to getting this right and responding the right way, what is the right way for them to respond? see, aren t i great diplomat, rachel? actually, they should call up their counterparts at the state department. i think the statement they put out today was correct. i would add a few more adjectives. it s outrageous. you can t establish this precedent. you can t put people like me let s be clear, they don t just want to question me about this
states. we let her out awaiting trial, she will be in russia faster than you can say borsct. her supposed american boyfriend is an intel operation, not love. this veteran counter espionage prosecutor saying, dude, it wasn t love. it was spying. we have the documentation to prove it. that probably hurts the feelings of u.s. person one. that said, if you are u.s. person one, you may have bigger worries. it is noted beak in passing late in today s hearing that u.s. person 1, who is again the american implicated as a co-conspirator in this spying case, u.s. person 1 is apparently the subject of another federal investigation involving the fbi and the u.s. attorney, the federal prosecutor in south dakota. from the transcript, mr. kenerson as the prosecutor says, it s my understanding miss butina s defense lawyer s offer
adversaries. we re very proud of that. it was very important not only because it was a legal event, it was also representative of describing what hacking meant to our citizens because we put a face on not only the adversaries who were attached to the back of the indictment, but we were able to describe the vips and tell the story about what hacking meant in the context of the chinese signature. am i right in that indictment the american public, anybody who bothered to read that indictment any of us who saw news reports about it, essentially learned something not just about what china was doing but what our government could do to witness that, to document it and trace it back to the bad actor who s did it and to monitor those kinds of activities in the future. we learned a lot about america s counter intelligence capabilities. we did. i m among those who believe we needed to reverse a default position in the government to allow hacking to occur without