organization? the second thing seems unlikely to me. the first thing, that he has cooperation i m sorry, that he has information about others and won t provide it, is troubling. again, you either cooperate or you don t. if you cooperate, you cooperate fully. so it s interesting to me that they would have a cooperation deal in place and only receive partial cooperation. i think that s a question worth answering at some point. does he have information about individuals and is he simply refusing to provide it? if the answer to that is yes and yes, then i wouldn t give him the benefit of a deal where he gets some credit, any credit, for quote/unquote, cooperation. so, chuck, why would prosecutors have agreed to that such deal if, in fact, the answer to those two questions, does he have information and will he testify are both yes? yeah, so it s possible, lindsey, that he doesn t have information that would implicate individuals. if he does, and government, in this case, the district
that could f very easily come here the right to die, maybe a right for the government and corporate interests, the health insurers to kill youa if you become inconvenient. charles kamisese thought a lot about this over a long time. he s the author of losing our dignity have sexualize medicine is undermining fundamental human qualities. also professor at creighton schoolli of medicine who joins us tonight. professor, thanks so much for. coming in . i know that you saw that you were the first person we thought of when we saws this piece. are we overstating what srsng happening here? and first of all, thank you so b much for covering it, tucker , because there s a lot ofto coverage and i think i have to wonder why. i mean, the violence is something we here covered ad nauseum. everything today is violence, even things obviously aren t violent. yes, this iss violence. this is medicalise violence. why isn t this being covered? why aren t we talking about itt especially when it s pooror peopl
a right around the corner. that is a complicated story because there was in fact this very unusual wikileaks centric operation that purportedly was staged by the russians the donald trump had. so, it was a question worth asking about donald trump and russia and on the other hand, donald trump politics are essential for attacking the media. and they really had a very powerful megaphone to do it. so trust in the media was eroded because he did a greatjob of doing it an independent of the russian investigation. far predating the russian investigation.
all of those allegations added up, eroded trust in significant sections of the society. do you think that is the case? i think that s true and it s a feature of what were talking about earlier that there was a, sort of an impulse, particularly on cable news to tell people what they wanted to hear, and impulsive and often feel in this business for he felt like the indictments of donald trump a right around the corner. that is a complicated story because there was in fact this very unusual wikileaks centric operation that purportedly was staged by the russians the donald trump had. so, it was a question worth asking about donald trump and russia and on the other hand, donald trump politics are essential for
like the indictments of donald trump a right around the corner. that is a complicated story because there was in fact this very unusual wikileaks centric operation that purportedly was staged by the russians the donald trump had. the russians on donald trump s behalf. so, it was a question worth asking about donald trump and russia and on the other hand, donald trump politics are essential for attacking the media. and they really had a very powerful megaphone to do it. so trust in the media was eroded because he did a greatjob of doing it an independent of the russian investigation. far predating the russian investigation. that set a lot of those dynamics up there really present there. lots of different dynamics that led to an erosion of trust which leads us to the point where,