had that conversation with mr. mueller, we ve not been waived off. on any subject. the way i m hearing all of you gentlemen is that mr. miller has not waived you off from answering any of these question questions. is that correct? i ve had no conversations with mr. mueller. i ve been out of the country for the last nine days. have any of you if you have not had questions waived off with mr. mueller, i think, i understand your commitment to the penetration, but our questions deserve answers, and at some point, the american public deserves full answers. ls mr. rosenstein to address that. i m sensitive to your desire to keep our answers brief and my full answer is very lengthy, but my brief answer from my perspective with the doj, our
worrisome for the white house almost no matter what he says. one of the questions is how much can he say and will it undercut bob mueller, the special counsel s own investigation which presumably is looking into the circumstances around james comey firing. we know that comey and mueller have discussed this. has he set any limits about what he can say? question questions about what the white house may try to do by exerting his executive privilege, questions about whether they can do that. today kellyanne conway would not rule that out. let s listen to that. administration officials are careful when they talk about anything. s you ask them just about question and they say they ll talk to the president. here s kellyanne conway. would the president try to say i have executive privilege? because james comey worked for the executive branch, this is a private conversation, i don t
attacker, the truck, yes, attack in manchester, a single person perpetrating the attack. there appeared to be a network behind him. we ll expect to hear more in the coming weeks and months. but this was three men. we saw it before in july, four men coming together in northern england. again, four men east african origin living in london. they worked together. the seg nature of working together in a group has delivered if you will, to intelligence services is bagger signature in the past, a bigger opportunity for counterterrorism officials can pick up that a group is planning to do something because they re talking to each other. in this case here it will raise question questions. if there was a group of three
about this is susan rice is a well-known cereal prevaricate her. she s been copped in an obvious lie caught in an obvious lie. how is it that reporters aren t going nuts asking her questions about this. why is she lying? why did she lie about this? bret: howard kurtz could do a whole segment on who is covering this. interesting experience with one of our reporters today on capitol hill asking what i think are the obvious questions. given the news in the story yesterday, eli lake, obvious questions to ask. why did she say a squat? how often does she do it? members of the intelligence committee asking these question questions. of the reporters asking questions of the same time were looking at her as if she were crazy. these are serious questions and
about this is susan rice is a well-known cereal prevaricate her. she s been copped in an obvious lie caught in an obvious lie. how is it that reporters aren t going nuts asking her questions about this. why is she lying? why did she lie about this? bret: howard kurtz could do a whole segment on who is covering this. interesting experience with one of our reporters today on capitol hill asking what i think are the obvious questions. given the news in the story yesterday, eli lake, obvious questions to ask. why did she say a squat? how often does she do it? members of the intelligence committee asking these question questions. of the reporters asking questions of the same time were looking at her as if she were crazy. these are serious questions and