you know, this is not the way the process works. now we re at the point where all of the evidence has been collected, and the president gets to present, you know, their case. and i suspect if they have a good case and the facts were with him, then they would want to do this, but they the truth is, for everybody who s read up on this, you know, the facts aren t in dispute. almost nobody s disputing the facts. yeah. we re down to one thing now, and that is, did what the president do, which was try to trade arms for dirt with the president of ukraine did what he did, is that an impeachable defense? that s the single question out today and that s what i think nadler will spend a lot of time discussing. as you started saying weeks ago, arms for dirt. arms for dirt. that was your coined phrase there. nice and simple. yeah. victoria, say the president decides to call his own witnesses. who do you think would ultimately make the case for impeachment? maybe not intentionally, bu