if there weren t something wrong, then why wouldn t we be allowed to get married? that was the question olson and boies wanted answered. they took on perry and stier and another couple as clintds. and they won in california against proposition 8, and now the case is always where they suspected it would end up, in supreme court. their argument is simple. same-sex marriage is a constitutional right, period. no matter how many states have voted to ban it. the reason we have the constitution, the reason we have a bill of rights is there are certain rights that are so fundamental to everybody that we say no majority can take it away. the attorneys arguing the other side read the constitution differently. there is no fundamental right to same-sex marriage in the u.s. constitution. austin nimocks is defending
wrong, then why wouldn t we be allowed to get married? that was the question olson and boies wanted answered. they took on perry and stier and another couple as clients. and they won in california against proposition 8, and now the case is always where they suspected it would end up, in supreme court. their argument is simple. same-sex marriage is a constitutional right, period. no matter how many states have voted to ban it. the reason we have the constitution, the reason we have a bill of rights is there are certain rights that are so fundamental to everybody that we say no majority can take it away. the attorneys arguing the other side read the constitution differently. there is no fundamental right to same-sex marriage in the u.s. constitution. austin nimocks is part of the legal team defending proposition 8.
wrong, then why wouldn t we be allowed to get married? that was the question olson and boies wanted answered. they took on perry and stier and another couple as clients. and they won in california against proposition 8, and now the case is always where they suspected it would end up, in supreme court. their argument is simple. same-sex marriage is a constitutional right, period. no matter how many states have voted to ban it. the reason we have the constitution, the reason we have a bill of rights is there are certain rights that are so fundamental to everybody that we say no majority can take it away. the attorneys arguing the other side read the constitution differently. there is no fundamental right to same-sex marriage in the u.s. constitution. austin nimocks is part of the
how has that impacted you every single day of your life? it s the most decision one makes in her adult life, and not being allowed to do so makes me feel like society thinks there is something kind of wrong with us. if there were not something wrong, then why wouldn t we be allowed to get married? that was the question olson and boise wanted answers. they took on more couples as clients and they won in california against proposition 8, and now the case is always where they suspected it would end up, in supreme court. their argument is simple. same-sex marriage is a constitutional right, period. no matter how many states have voted to ban it. the reason we have the constitution, the reason we have adult rights, there are certain rights that are so fundamental