skepticism, the degree to which they seemed downright hostile to this argument. you played a clip there of a judge cutting off the lawyer for president trump who not only were advancing losing arguments but they were also trying to stall. they were saying things like this court should look at each individual document, document by document, and that s when the judge said whoa, whoa, whoa, we re not looking at these individual documents, which would take months and months and months. what she said was the question here is who gets to decide, is it the current president or a former president? and they seemed very skeptical of this idea that a former president can decide. and in fact, they also suggested that it s quite possible that even the court shouldn t be deciding this case and instead simply deferring to the current president, president biden. yeah. they kept citing that there s no conflict between the branches in this case, that to the extent that the court is there to adjudicate
documents. and they said whoa we re not looking at these individual documents which will take months and months. what she said was, the question is who gets to the side? is it the current president, or former president? she very skeptical from the idea that the v of the side also suggesting that even the court shouldn t be deciding in this case. simply conferring to this case. they kept side there is no conflict in the branch of this case. to the extent of the quarters that are adjudicated governmental inter branch of conflicts. both branches agree, president congress to your point about this there s one point were trump s lawyers raise a sort of bizarre notion to me that a judge themselves to go through documents! and review then? it seems like a strange proposal for a bunch of reasons, here s williams responding to that. we can reach the question before we get to that, take a listen! i don t see anything
communications. we are also hearing different things from metals, and from the committee itself from the actual verbal interview. the question the answer session that knows it s gonna do with the committee. members of the select committee is gonna come in next week, and use the term deposition. that means he ll be under oath. that means meadows will be liable for prosecution in the justice department. meadows and his lawyers signaled that they don t actually want to do a sworn that position. there s a gap there between what they re doing or they re using. what we do know for sure is that in the end of days meadow has essentially flipped from the state farm committee to engaging and trying to be helpful. presumably the reason for that is because he doesn t want to get the ban in treatment. he doesn t want to get charged, he s trying to somehow meet the committee in the middle and be helpful. there s no question that that has the potential to be a breakthrough for investigators. all ri
to make this chemical? and why should he? you can hear the skepticism here. in the articulations of the judges receive again the former president arguments. it appears there are some progress being made, from what donald trump and his former coup prevalence are up to. despite all their efforts and desire to high they re communications leading up to the deadly search. just today the guardian published an article about alleged folk all that then president trump made to this or cold war room. which is pushing his election fraud just hours before the insurrection himself. where he reportedly stressed to his allies that he wanted the latest-ification by the house of commons. it should know that it has not been confirmed by any sources. i don t know if that s gonna bear out or not, but the question of whether it is true?
that is engaged in the celebration and fantasize the shin of violence. and we have a president, a prior president, who has spent four years making us fearful of each other. making us think that we have to arm ourselves in order to protect ourselves from the others. it is a toxic combination that has led to the highest rates of gun violence in our lifetime. and at this time that we refused to accept it. it is time that we do something about it. do you know what is truly am profoundly bizarre, you say that the statistics are a polarization of the problem or the question depending on how it is freeze. republicans would love to talk here off about crime. that crime is going up. crime is a problem. if you say gun violence it s like, well but that is the most severe form of crime. the thing that we should be most worried about is when people take up arms against each other. when they kill each other. and the main way they do that