Apparently so excited to indict the former president that actually ask only posted charges online before the grand jury rendered a decision. We are not sure if the judge is going to read the decision. We will listen in as indicated. All indications, the leak came out this afternoon. Could have been the d. A. Jumping the gun. Lets listen. Can you tell us what it says . I didnt get a good look. So you all need to leave. Weve had a long day. These folks cant go until you all go. I know we had talked about leaving the equipment here. Dont leave the equipment here. Youre not going to want to be here tomorrow. Youre welcome to be here. We dont have a rule 22 for whats going on tomorrow. Did you find anything good . The decision. They can come collect it. However has audio. Dont forget audio over here. Are these yours . Your buddys . Yep. Yep. Lets go. Sean as we continue on hannity, were watching live scenes out of the Fulton County courthouse. What we are looking at right now is the grand j
So excited to indict the former president. They actually accidentally posted charges online this morning before the grand jury rendered a decision. Were not sure if the judge is going to read that decision. Were going to listen in as indicated. All indications are the leak came out this afternoon and could have been the d. A. Jumping the gun. Lets listen. If he tells what it says, it was to get a good look. So you all need to leave. I mean, politely and nicely. Youve had a long day, but these folks cant go until you all go. I know we had talked about leaving the equipment here. Dont leave the equipment here because youre not going to want to be here tomorrow. Youre welcome to be here if you dont have a rule 22 for whats going to happen tomorrow. Just get all that. So you find anything good happens, you have that stupid decision. You mind taking that . They can come to the election . You just want to put them down. The guy was right there on everything youre doing, okay . You have to wo
And tonight to trump legal strategies and the evidence that one is working and the other might be working. Again. Its the former president of the United States. The first deny, deny, deny in minutes, the eightyear history of the many, many times that trump has repeated his denials about Stormy Daniels and insisted a picture is all there is to the story. Now the adult film star, as you can imagine, telling a very different version of events, the jury under oh, today and sayyed 100 center street. Now, daniels left out the way the most salacious details, but not much else. She chronicled how that night and lake tahoe in 2006 escalated from chatter to a Dinner Invitations that is hotel suite to silk Pajamas Deposing and his boxers on the bed to sex. Trump. Listen, they scowl extra across his face from much of the nilly five hours that shes spent on that Witness Stand. Trump nudge. Did i say nudge lightly . Nudge his laura is as repeatedly to object as prosecutors prompted daniels to explai
this is an attack on the republican party. don t you dare challenge elections. don t you dare send and other electors. don t you dare question machines. don t you dare do a dam thing because nobody knows what the rules are in these democrat cities and states. unrelenting a little bit of issue with my friend jonathan turley. it s not clear in the constitution whether you can indict a sitting president. they don t even mention it. the reason you cannot indict a sitting president is because both parties have agreed under attorneys general of either parties, legal counsel, the we don t indict sitting presidents because of trigger you will captivate the government so in basis of comity and bipartisanship it s been decided you don t do that to a president. i would find it hard to believe that under article six, paragraph two of the constitution, commonly referred
this is an attack on the republican party. don t you dare challenge elections. don t you dare send another electors. don t you dare question machines. don t you dare do a thing because nobody knows what the rules are in these democrats cities of the states anymore. it is horrendous. i want to take a little bit of issue with my friend jonathan. true. it s not clear in the constitution, whether you can indict a sitting president. in fact, they don t even mention it. the reason you cannot indict a sitting president is because both parties have agreed under the attorneys general of either party, the office of legal counsel. that we don t indict sitting president because it will be capitated government at the same time, the man or woman in that office is trying to defend their liberty trying to stay out of prison. so on basis of comedy and bipartisanship. it s been decided you don t do that to a president. i would find it hard to believe that under article six, paragraph two of the constitu