they have been trying hard to hold the line in the stay non-partisan and out of the politics. the president keeps pulling them into difficult situations. every time he talks to a military audience he rails against the democrats and talks about taxes and brings up domestic political issues they have no business hearing and no business being a part of. and makes it difficult. he s putting them in a difficult spot tomorrow. what i understand each of the planes flies over he ll bring up the service chief responsible for that and have him with him. wrapping his arms around the military and making it about not just them. but him. that s totally inappropriate. break it down for me. why is this so problematic? because it doesn t feel right? or are their guidelines in place that say you can t be at a political rally. a campaign event. what s the crux ocht issue? there are strict regulations
printed for them to go out so it looks like the question doesn t make it. this is what the president is saying today. a couple tweets tell us he s not done with it. here s what he says. seems totally ridiculous that our government, and indeed country, cannot ask a basic question of citizenship in a very expensive, detailed and important census, in this case for 2020. i have asked the lawyers if they can delay the census, no matter how long, until the united states supreme court is given additional information from which it can make a final and decisive decision on this very critical matter. can anyone really believe that as a great country, we are not able the ask whether or not someone is a citizen. only in america! it s funny because there were a number of concurring decisions, dissenting decisions. justice alito wrote one that went both ways and he asked in the hyperpartisan environment, it s a political question to be people are calling it racist. he said a lot of other countries
or uranium it s safe and it c o 2. who do shows that his colleagues still don t know at what temperature the fusion reaction will run bad. it s just one of the key questions that still need an answer. he s often asked whether nuclear fusion will ever be a viable way to generate energy. that question doesn t really occupy me as long as the technology works it s very unlikely that we won t have a use for it even if we could cover our energy needs with solar cells or whatever they ll still be applications where we ll want to draw on a consistent and steady source of energy. and. this is the fusion centers controlled room in 2018 a 100 scientists came here to carry out terrorist safety is an important question another is nuclear waste. all the materials are chosen to have
to be in. that s a very ugly place for america to be. before i let you go, do you support nancy pelosi has the next speaker of the house? there just can t be an interview where that question doesn t get asked, does it? it seems to be the 64 million-dollar question. the woman, marcia fudge, who was one of the i guess, who was the main person that was going to run against her does support nancy pelosi. what about you? i chair the tpnew democratic coalition and we are talking to all of the members seeking leadership positions, asking them what their vision is and how they would imagine themselves as leaders of the party, until we complete that process i will not answer that. i am aware the math is tough on
events. i will refer back to what i have written previously i m just asking you do you read the paper? do you watch television? the special counsel statute in question doesn t exist anymore, does it? the independent counsel statute independent counsel statute. does not exist anymore since 1999. traditional counsel system i ve written about is the ordinary way that outside investigations is that an executive branch function? that is ordinarily appointed by the attorney general and is who s a member of what? the executive branch. so last time i checked that s not a separation of powers issue. that traditionally is as i ve written is an executive branch now, the question is, if someone s appointed a special counsel by department of justice regulations who has authority overseeing those regulations,