i think the fundamental concern i still have is, do the people on the rule of law side understand the fight they are in? or are they still playing by marquee of queensbury rules? they have to in many ways, that s what the rule of law is. this is the paradox. the rule of law is plotting, slow, careful. it is not jazz hands. it is sober to a fault. but when you are dealing with, not a politician who may have committed some crimes by accident, but a kind of mob leader, fascist, autocrat wanna-be, whose criminality is the essence of his pretensions to rule, is the traditional american way of dealing with the rule of law adequate to that? i m not sure that, if you look at other countries and other eras, that their approaches to the rule of law were sufficient to prevent the rise of dictatorships and other very
Cornell Law professor Joseph Margulies continues his discussion of why anger can benefit democracy, but he rebuts claims that only anti-democratic solutions can remedy the harms that are supposedly being inflicted on our society. Specifically, Professor Margulies points out as evidence of effective democratic processes the imminent passage of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and the rejection by Kansas voters of a state constitutional amendment that could allow the legislature to restrict or prohibit abortions in that state.
democracy. we need transparency. we need accountability. and the secret service decided protecting donald trump is more important than protecting american democracy. i can t imagine, i can t imagine, how the department of justice wouldn t launch an investigation today. hey merrick wake up, hey, merrick garland, wake up. hey, merrick, wake up. investigate this cover-up. let me put it in stark terms for you, in case you re afraid to break marcus of queensbury rules in boxing there was an attempted fascist overthrow of american democracy. the people, the taxpayers pay to protect the presidency, not donald trump, but the presidency, they destroyed text