comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Qiushi wu - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Intentionally buggy commits for fame—and papers [LWN net]

Intentionally buggy commits for fame—and papers [LWN net]
lwn.net - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from lwn.net Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

The University of Minnesota Banned by Linux – Why Open Source is Problematic

The University of Minnesota Banned by Linux – Why Open Source is Problematic Recently, two researchers from the University of Minnesota and fellow graduates could upload intentionally buggy code and junk code into the Linux Kernel and accepted by the community. Why did the researchers do this, how did the Linux community react, and what does this demonstrate about open source software? Researchers Upload Buggy Code to Demonstrate Security Flaws Recently, a paper was released by the University of Minnesota written by Qiushi Wu and Kanhjie Lu titled “On the Feasibility of Stealthily Introducing Vulnerabilities in Open-Source Software via Hypocrite Commits”. The paper describes how the two researchers could generate code that claims to fix one bug in the Linux kernel while intentionally introducing other bugs. The Linux kernel is open-source, and as such, can be accessed by the wider community, and anyone can suggest changes to the code via submissions.

How a university got itself banned from the Linux kernel

How a university got itself banned from the Linux kernel The University of Minnesota’s path to banishment was long, turbulent, and full of emotion On the evening of April 6th, a student emailed a patch to a list of developers. Fifteen days later, the University of Minnesota was banned from contributing to the Linux kernel. “I suggest you find a different community to do experiments on,” wrote Linux Foundation fellow Greg Kroah-Hartman in a livid email. “You are not welcome here.” How did one email lead to a university-wide ban? I’ve spent the past week digging into this world the players, the jargon, the university’s turbulent history with open-source software, the devoted and principled Linux kernel community. None of the University of Minnesota researchers would talk to me for this story. But among the other major characters the Linux developers there was no such hesitancy. This was a community eager to speak; it was a community betrayed.

The Linux Foundation s demands to the University of Minnesota for its bad Linux patches security project

The Linux Foundation s demands to the University of Minnesota for its bad Linux patches security project ZDNet 4 hrs ago © Fatos Bytyqi To say that Linux kernel developers are livid about a pair of University of Minnesota (UMN) graduate students playing at inserting security vulnerabilities into the Linux kernel for the purposes of a research paper On the Feasibility of Stealthily Introducing Vulnerabilities in Open-Source Software via Hypocrite Commits is a gross understatement.  Greg Kroah-Hartman, the Linux kernel maintainer for the stable branch, well-known for being the most generous and easygoing of the Linux kernel maintainers, exploded and banned UMN developers from working on the Linux kernel. That was because their patches had been obviously submitted in bad faith with the intent to cause problems.  

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.