government of going back on a promise to spend more on aid. so there are policy differences, clearly come up with the prime minister, and also personal criticism of the prime minister, but in addition to that, look at the timing, rishi sunak is unveiling a big policy announcement at lunchtime, holding a press conference, talking about extra investment, more staff into the nhs, and he hasjust lost a government minister that he had only yesterday defended and that, quite frankly, in the eyes of the opposition at least, may be in the eyes of boris johnson s allies too, will make him look weak. i johnson s allies too, will make him look weak. . . ., .,. look weak. i have encountered zac goldsmith, look weak. i have encountered zac goldsmith, because look weak. i have encountered zac goldsmith, because one look weak. i have encountered zac goldsmith, because one of - look weak. i have encountered zac goldsmith, because one of my - look weak. i have encountered zac i goldsmith, because
reform. your example are said to be a vague definition of sinister forces, the mindset of opposition and blaming everyone else. the idea of blobenomics and blaming everyone else. the idea of blobenomics as and blaming everyone else. the idea of blobenomics as there and blaming everyone else. the idea of blobenomics as there is and blaming everyone else. the idea of blobenomics as there is a - and blaming everyone else. the idea of blobenomics as there is a flawed i of blobenomics as there is a flawed economic of blobenomics as there is a flawed economic model that is pushed by the treasurer economic model that is pushed by the treasurer i economic model that is pushed by the treasurer. i will give you two good examples treasurer. i will give you two good examples. number one, as a government, a conservative government, a conservative government, we have spent more money building government, we have spent more money building a government, we have spent more money build
on that list. there is a body whose job it is to oversee and advise the prime minister on whether the names put forward are appropriate. the house of lords appointments commission, and they have confirmed that they rejected eight of the names that borisjohnson put forward. mrjohnson, and those around him, have suspected that rishi sunak, or number ten more widely, made their own attempts to remove some of the names from that list, or in some way, overrule mr johnson s intentions. they deny that that was the case and this morning, rishi sunak was axed to live asked about this directly. about this directly. when it comes to honours about this directly. when it comes to honours and about this directly. when it comes to honours and boris about this directly. when it comes to honours and boris johnson, - about this directly. when it comes i to honours and boris johnson, boris to honours and borisjohnson, boris johnson to honours and borisjohnson, boris johnson asked me to do someth
inflation, because teachers. let me answer that. high inflation, because the teachers. let me answer that. high inflation, because the country - teachers. let me answer that. high inflation, because the country isn t| inflation, because the country isn t doing so well after brexit. now people cannot afford to pay their bills. that is why they are going on strike. that s another mess he got us into. the reason the strike started is because of him! now you are telling me you are defending him, he has done well, getting us out, stepped up to the plate. these are clearly complex out, stepped up to the plate. these are clearly complex matters - out, stepped up to the plate. these are clearly complex matters which l are clearly complex matters which deserve further attention. there is a central question this morning, whether you think this is a political stitch up of boris johnson. thank you, and kaz, thank you so much a deed. i johnson. thank you, and kaz, thank you so much a deed. j
up, and i doubt he has come he deserves to be. he stitch up the country using brexit to further his own narcissistic ambitions. andrew in cardiff. and why are you doing this topic on the phone in? you get the usual partisan and [con opinions. everyone will stick to their views. will anyone change their views. will anyone change their mind? johnson is clearly a lying, corrupt and lazy man. my view will never change because the evidence is clear, that is from richard in york. but you have had enough, tim? richard in york. but you have had enough. tim? richard in york. but you have had i enough, tim? simple enough, tim? yes, basically. simple as. linda, enough, tim? yes, basically. simple as- linda. in enough, tim? yes, basically. simple as. linda, in st enough, tim? yes, basically. simple as. linda, in st albans, enough, tim? yes, basically. simple as. linda, in st albans, have - enough, tim? yes, basically. simple as. linda, in st albans, have you - as. linda, in st albans, have