from msnbc world headquarters in new york. welcome to alex witt reports. we begin with new word on donald trump s legal team preparing to challenge states that are trying to keep him off the ballot. the new york times saying these new filings could happen as soon as tuesday. both colorado and the main cases. maine joined colorado this week, disqualifying trump from its primary ballot, citing its role in the january 6th capitol riot. main secretary of state, shayna pillows, telling msnbc s laura mcdonald that she was bound to make this decision. i was duty bound to follow the two ensure that the candidates, all of them who appear on the primary ballot, or qualified for the office they seek. joining me now is emma barnett, who is in kittery, maine, for us. we are going to break this down. you have been reporting on section three of the 14th amendment. you have been following the possibility of donald trump being removed from this ballot for months. tell me how we got here a
or four people that use all of the leverage to say, we could swing the entire speakership here? here s the bottom line, and this is really critical, because at some point, these races will be called, and we have enough information for what i am about to suggest. democrats need to control the agenda unapologetically for two years. joe biden needs to give a speech declaring what agenda is and say republicans, we ll invite you to the table when we want your opinion. and i mean the. we have gone from maybe republicans won baked another not to know is put decision, to not democrats voting on, and it has this feeling, like somehow is put the decision is a win. this is not a split decision. this is a historic victory for democrats, where the ground is shifting in american politics, and the voters for three elections in a row have now set, we want to go the direction of democrats are taking us. joe biden, nancy pelosi, chuck schumer need to declare victory, the clear what their agenda is for t
trafalgar square there s a rotating one that s always got something new on it, maybe we should have more of that going on in the future? as have more of that going on in the future? : :, .., have more of that going on in the future? ~ . , , ., have more of that going on in the future? : . , , ., ., future? a radical suggestion, and martin, this future? a radical suggestion, and martin, this was future? a radical suggestion, and martin, this was an future? a radical suggestion, and martin, this was an amazing - future? a radical suggestion, and martin, this was an amazing case | martin, this was an amazing case because, as the telegraph highlights, the prosecution claimed it was irrelevant to who colston was, but the defence said that the presence of the statue was a hate crime in itself, and they also said that actually, the defendants effectively own the statue because it belongs to the people of bristol. so it was up to them what they would do with it. so the jury made their