if congress is ambiguous in its law, we will defer to the federal regulatory agencies who will then decide. they will make their own laws. they will make their own rules. i think a new balance has been struck. john roberts has always been very good on these economic regulatory issues. it s a 6-3 decision. it basically says, you want to have that kind of carbon policies, carbon emissions policies, you need to clarify and get a law. which by the way, i don t think they could. this is about how you measure clean air. it also is about how many times you measure the same air, which is what the obama s wanted and what the biden crowd is wanting to do. measure it many times. there s also a federal versus state issue year. federalism. it is essentially saying, i ll have to to read this decision obviously. i think it s in the say that the
that s right. the congress has been unable to pass legislation to address the problem of climate change. the biden administration said, we re going to by regulation the supreme court said today, we re sorry, but congress is going to have to pass a law. this is too big a deal for it to implicitly have been left to the regulatory agents. that s a problem not just with respect to climate change but to the administration generally because it s so hard to get serious legislation passed through the congress. that means that your agencies can t tackle this. kimberly, let s talk about some of the other rulings. in particular, the remain in mexico ruling. the biden administration won this 5-4. the three liberals lining up
complete bands. and then there was reform law in the number of other states. even ruth bader ginsburg at that time about this was problematic that roe vs. wade was actually arresting that whole development, and evolution of the law and state. what we have been arguing for a half a century is that the court should never have taken this away from the states. that it should have been left there for them to regulate. and that people would eventually in the places where they live have the abortion regime under the law that they were more comfortable with rather than one imposed by a court in washington. now where they are talking about is having washington impose a one-size-fits-all pursuing through congress rather than courts. i really don t think that is any better. i doubt i think that a lot of the supreme court is going to have a lot of problem with that too. dana: you are here because we have two big supreme court announcements and opinions that are going to come down in just
and so i m going to be talking to the governors as to what actions they think i should be taking as well. and but the most important thing to be clear about it is we have to change i believe we have to codify roe v. wade in the law and the way to do that is to make sure that the congress votes to do that and if the filibuster gets in the way, it s like voting rights, it should be provided an exception for this require an exception to the filibuster for this action to deal with the supreme court decision. hang on. i have one more here. kelly o donnell, nbc. thank you, mr. president. we just made some news saying you would support changing broadly across the country. the right to privacy is not just abortion rights. but yes, abortion rights. can you describe for us, sir, many americans are grappling
u.s. industry sector? that s right. what the court has done in the past is the say that major questions like this should come with the added burden that congress should be heard on it. they have gotten increasingly uncomfortable with agencies effectively taking these questions away from the legislative branch. indeed, taking away from the political process. this is an excellent example of why that concern is so relevant. the obama administration and the biden administration have pushed congress for more strict environmental protections. there are many people that balk at that including democrats. dana: i m sorry to interrupt you here. we ve got the ruling in from shannon bream from our supreme court producer. they have ruled against the biden administration over climate change authority. this is considered a major blow