The intel memo the underlying content he will join me along with Jim Kallstrom and Alan Dershowitz on that. And the sell off on wall street the worst week for stocks in two years whats behind the plunge what do things look like Going Forward House Financial Services chairman will join me live, and then the deadline looming for a shortterm spending bill are there any obsticles in the way a closer look at that right now as we look ahead on sunday morning futures. Now, the latest on that memo President Trump says that the gop memo released friday completely clears him in the special counsel mueller probe. The president tweeting yesterday on the top being saying that this, that memo alleges the fbi relied excessively on an antitrump dossier funded by democrats to spy on a Trump Campaign advisor. Joining me right now is congressman john rathcliff of texas a member of the House Judiciary Committee one of the only three lawmakers to have actually seen the intel behind the memo the underlying
Content he will join me along with Jim Kallstrom and Alan Dershowitz on that. And the sell off on wall street the worst week for stocks in two years whats behind the plunge what do things look like Going Forward House Financial Services chairman will join me live, and then the deadline looming for a shortterm spending bill are there any obsticles in the way a closer look at that right now as we look ahead on sunday morning futures. Now, the latest on that memo President Trump says that the gop memo released friday completely clears him in the special counsel mueller probe. The president tweeting yesterday on the top being saying that this, that memo alleges the fbi relied excessively on an antitrump dossier funded by democrats to spy on a Trump Campaign advisor. Joining me right now is congressman john rathcliff of texas a member of the House Judiciary Committee one of the only three lawmakers to have actually seen the intel behind the memo the underlying content also with me here is J
Following the recent string of violence both President Trump and the commander of the u. S. And nato forces in afghanistan John Nicholson said the washington would spare no effort to defeat the insurgents and to bring peace to the region the taliban responded threatening more attacks in retaliation to what it called a policy of aggression the us has considerably stepped up its air campaign in the country over the last year twenty seventeen washington dropped more than four thousand bombs in afghanistan between august and december last year the u. S. Carried out as many airstrikes as it did in the previous two years combined security and political analyst Mushfiqur Rahim believes that even though military action is important in the fight against extremists this alone will not bring peace to afghanistan. A military offensive is always needed because you have to keep the militant groups at bay from the main cities and from from taking over the country and different provinces in different
Overseas. So i really dont see this as something we should preempt the laws of the United States. 2. 5 million comments. Republicans dont care much about the comments. 2. 5 million comments that are still being evaluated, raising concerns about various aspects of this project. But here, i will say, bad legislation, good politics, we are trying to help someone get elected to the senate who is currently a member of the house, the senate is potentially moving ahead with this bill. The house, with very little notice, zidded they would bring up this bill that we have passed in one version or another eight previous times. And use of the house of representatives to promotes candidacy to the United States senate, which i think is a really a disgrace to this institution. With that, i would reserve the balance of my time. The speaker pro tempore the gentleman from oregon reserves. Mr. Shuster its now my pressure to yield two minutes to the subcommittee chairman of railroads and pipelines, mr. De
Gallons of diesel yet our going to take w, were this tar sand goop and process it in the u. S. And export it. Its not going to help the processors. And then there are minor environmental issues. Tar sands do create 81 more Greenhouse Gas than most other forms of fossil fuel extraction. They are going to destroy forever, forever, large portions of forests. Im sure that is a canadian issue. If i lived in canada, they would be protesting. I dont. We dont need to build a pipeline there. They will use precious Water Resources and create waste pits that will be polluted with the extract, except for the part that which is shipped south to be processed and shipped overseas. So i really dont see this as something we should preempt the laws of the United States. 2. 5 million comments. Republicans dont care much about the comments. 2. 5 million comments that are still being evaluated, raising concerns about various aspects of this project. But here, i will say, bad legislation, good politics, we