hours after a redacted copy of the affidavit was unsealed. it s not proof of the time, instead it represents the doj is believed that it has probable cause that a trump has been committed. trump s legal team filed a document late last night, to get a special master the editorial boards of major newspapers, the railway in. we ve got the new york times editorial saying donald trump is not above the law. the washington post editorial board says the trump affidavit shows the mar-a-lago search was hardly capricious. the wall street journal editorial board as, the mar-a-lago affidavit, is that all there is? a bit earlier today sheila jackson lee told msnbc have the classified documents in question could be a national security risk. when you think of the names of the sources of individuals who were securing important information through human deeds, human activities, if that was exposed, not only with these individuals be in jeopardy, where they snow in posted in countries aroun
say on the national security front? sure, two things really jumped out at me. the first thing was obviously the classifications. they did not redact that. the classification levels of the documents that were taken. i was very surprised to see just how high these classifications were. and just how detailed they were. you ve got information from the human to control systems, which are our sources and assets overseas. you have signals intelligence, that is highly classified information. or con, which is originator controlled, which means that you decide how that information is distributed. and the second piece i saw in that it was just how purposeful trump was in not handing over the documents. that s concerning to me as well. i have to tell you, i have to think about you, given you and your experience of the past, that must have sent chills down your spine. hugo, what did this