as well. i want to read for the speaker. this is pure speculation as the speaker himself said he is not going anywhere any time soon. that s a non-denial denial. any time soon. pure speculation. right now. the speaker is somebody and it has been no secret who was a reluctant speaker as phil was saying. he was nervous about the job and impact on his family. he was quite nervous about dealing with the right in the party. the same conservatives that gave him trouble on the affordable care act and the repealing of that. i don t think the job has gotten easier with donald trump. he was reluctant to endorse that. it was an uneasy relationship. he doesn t like to explain the president s tweets and it s doi
in this situation, what was his egress route going to be? he was at 320 feet. it s inconceivable he would have had a portable reserve parachute. they don t open below 500 feet. i think the sheriff might have been referring to disguise, maybe he had a hotel employee uniform in place. maybe we could look toward the tanner right. it s got imodium nitrate in it. it s not combustible by heat, but it is by contact. maybe setting some of that off by diversion. pure speculation right now but the sheriff did confirm yes, there were plans in place for him to escape. which again, he s a 64-year-old man which goes outside the normal bracketing of the age of these shooters. and having an escape route. most of these we ve seen it s either a suicide, which was this
casualty event by gun in modern american history? yeah, and look at the sandy hook shooter who s at the other end of the age scale but not a lot of pictures of him. look, we have three types of individuals that are involved in these kind of mass symbolic attacks. the first is the ideologically motivated. they re either political, religious, or a hybrid. we don t think that s here. isis claimed responsibility, but they ve been claiming responsibility for nearly every train derailment and they claimed responsibility for a casino attack in june in the philippines which wasn t true either. so let s put that on the shelf. number two, psychologically dangerous. someone who s either a sociopath, has a cognitive impairment or i maybe something organic. this is something, again, pure speculation, we don t have a lot of information. but charles whitman, the university of texas shooter 1966 in the bell tower. yes. he had a brain tumor. so was there some kind of event either in his persona
it was natural to assume that perhaps he would do the same thing to another person whose activities were hurting him specially. everybody publicly who is speaking on record, close to him, is saying don t do this, don t fire mueller. i believe these are ways are sending signals to him because i suspect, pure speculation, he would very much like to get rid of robert mueller. when i said the majority of the conversation is geared that way it s by the president s design. he continues tweeting about the russia investigation, though we ve heard from several aides and sources they ve tried to get him to avoid doing that. it would be a disaster, it would be an absolute disaster if he attempted indirectly to force mueller out. it took richard nixon a longer time to force out the special prosecutor in 1973. this entire story is on caffeine. it s going much faster it may not have the same result and may
the press are trying to push bannon out of the white house? amy: the coverage of bannon has always been nasty and the press painted him as a darth vader puppet controller of trump. the only story than the press likes more is gop and sex scandals. but at this point the speculation he s going to be pushed out of the white house is pure speculation. the media is licking their chaps at getting to grill steve bannon. howie: has that affected the way he s covered? marie: he treats them with disdain. he said he came to blow up washington and the press is the enemy.