To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
The following telephone arguments will be available to the
public live. Access information will be available by 9 AM ET
each day of argument at: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/public-access-arguments.
Monday, April 5, 2021
Publishing Technologies, LLC v. RPX Corporation, No.
20-1420
After Publishing Technologies asserted U.S. Patent No. 7,908,342
( the 342 Patent ) against RPX Corporation, RPX
filed two IPR petitions challenging the claims of the 342
patent. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board ( PTAB )
instituted on both. While the PTAB declined to construe certain
terms at institution, instead giving them their plain and ordinary
Thursday, April 1, 2021
The following telephone arguments will be available to the public live. Access information will be available by 9 AM ET each day of argument at: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/public-access-arguments.
Monday, April 5, 2021
Publishing Technologies, LLC v. RPX Corporation, No. 20-1420
After Publishing Technologies asserted U.S. Patent No. 7,908,342 (“the ’342 Patent”) against RPX Corporation, RPX filed two IPR petitions challenging the claims of the ’342 patent. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) instituted on both. While the PTAB declined to construe certain terms at institution, instead giving them their plain and ordinary meaning as RPX had urged, in the FWDs, the PTAB adopted Publishing’s proposed constructions of these terms before finding the claims invalid.