she was found lying face down with a large amount of blood. what does the scene tell you? what do your victims tell you? you ve got a killer loose here who specifically targeting people. yeah. she was somebody that he really thought was smart on him, he had animosity towards her. there was a doctor s house. somebody s after the doctors. four people are dead because of somebody s vengeance. revenge, that s their motives. revenge. it sent shockwaves right away. no fingerprints, no bloody footprints next thing you know, you are trying to constantly find out what s going on. park your car somewhere else, walk to the location. the list a killer would make? yes, it is. he said, they had it coming. where is he going? what s he gonna do? you re getting real life. god, what the hell do we have here? winter on the great plains can be long, bleak, brutal. so, in march, when winter briefly releases its grip for a day or two, even the trees seemed to
policies. as we ve seen, the campaign, the candidates are out on the trail, trying to talk to voters. so many of their questions revolve around the former president. that is what they re really focused on. that s what they d love to see. it s not the fact that they won t embrace january 6th, it s the fact that they ve even reacted at all. it s where do you stand on all of these things that are happening with the former president. rather than where do you stand on this policy or these voters in particular. sticking to no such thing as bad publicity rule, perhaps, kristen holmes, thanks so much. boris. let s discuss with ben ginsburg and the lead former investigator for the january 6th select committee tim heaphy. thank you for being with us. ben, first to you, for mike pence, we just heard questioning whether what donald trump did on january 6 was actually legal or illegal. but if the special counsel chooses to indict him, it would be based on much more than the
date was set for april 2016. then, this story took a most unexpected turn. thursday or friday before that monday started jury selection, alison matta says to us and to to local tv stations, we have dna tests that prove that our guy was not a law hunter sherman scene. allison matta spoke with tv via skype. there s physical evidence and there s dna evidence that the staff was undeniably unmistakably in without doubt, those murders were committed by two people, not anthony garcia. the claim was based on what the matta s believed was a potential match with some an identifiable dna found on surely sherman s bandana, and some dna taken from a suspect and another case. they are taking illegals from dna, bits and pieces, and coming up with a theory that never made it to trial. and she throws it out there on the eve of the trial. and, prosecutors it really chopped the judge. the judge took it as a clear attempt to send information to potential jurors that the state s case was sus
potential jurors that the state s case was suspect. as a result, the trial was postponed again. and the judge effectively kicked allison matta off the case. the judge denies her application to practice in the state of nebraska. very controversial move. it was just. i spoke to the public, and that put information that could have been information to potential jurors. and that violated the pretrial publicity rule. the matta s wanted to fight allison s removal. what s their clients anthony garcia apparently wanted was a trial. when the matta s appealed for his convention, anthony garcia completely stop talking with his own lawyers. he deteriorated mentally coming into the trial, to the extent where he didn t say one with us. his mental state at that point was just gone. it was september 2016, eight
out there on the eve of trial, and prosecutors are incensed, and it really chapped the judge. the judge took it as a clear attempt to send information to potential jurors that the state s case was suspect. as a result, the trial was postponed again, and the judge effectively kicked alison motta off the case. the judge denies her application to practice in the state of nebraska, very controversial move. it was just i spoke to the public, and that put, you know, information that could ve, you know, been information to potential jurors, and that violated the pretrial publicity rule. the mottas wanted to fight alison s removal, but what their client anthony garcia apparently wanted was a trial. when the mottas appealed over his objection, anthony garcia completely stopped talking with his own lawyers. he d deteriorated mentally, coming into the trial to the