court yesterday? or was it as one of the hosts on the view suggested a short time ago, or is this just a publicity play? well, he doesn t have a stake in necessarily what s happening with respect to the warrants per se. he could argue that he has this pending separate civil litigation involving similar issues and he wants to make sure he has access to whatever information bears on that lawsuit. now, we don t know what judge woods rationale was or if it was an open hearing, he doesn t necessarily need a court authorization to appear. now, speaking is another issue. i m not sure what her rigs nall was for it. i think there s a case to be made this was part of a pr campaign rather than a straight-up legal issue. sure, lawyers will sit in on relevant cases to make sure they re doing the best job for their client in their particular case. but these two things aren t directly related as a legal matter. there s no legal right to be in
election and you then say, what s the status or the non-status? no, you have to have some discussion about it. of course he knew. not only that but under section 1.4 of the code of professional responsibility as i understand it in new york you have a duty to communicate. you can t go willy nilly settling things without your client s knowledge. of course he knew. it seems like they are digging deeper for themselves. the reality is he knew. is the contract valid? will it shut her up because they re able to enforce it? if they can t enforce it, then the flood gates are open. but it sounds to me like they got all they needed. because i believe it s a publicity play for her. i don t think you have to have one side or the other and everybody wins at all. she wasn t telling the truth at one time. she said it didn t happen now she s saying it happened. of course we heard the denials from the white house. he knew. she knew what she was doing. and here we find them trying to set aside whether
the reality is he knew. is the contract valid? will it shut her up because they re enforce it? if they can t enforce it, then the flood gates are open. but it sounds to me like they got all they needed. because i believe it s a publicity play for her. i don t think you have to have one side or the other and everybody wins at all. she wasn t telling the truth at one time. she said it didn t happen now saying it happened. of course we heard the denials from the white house process. he knew. she knew what she was doing. and here we find ourselves them trying to set aside whether successful or not i don t know. thank you representative. when we come back the head of hud doesn t like the agency furniture or mission statement. why dr. carson is looking at removing the pledge to keep communities free from discrimination. she s really good at social media. she buys stocks in companies that stand for something. you like her. she s always up on the latest trends.
her remarks, just saw oprah s empowering and inspiring speech at last night s golden globes, let s all come together, women and men, and say times up. one person that s come together is john fedoris, you are a patriot. seems to be excited about the oprah booming. if you take a look at today s fork post. he has a great editorial. i called it. and he did and this is serious. this isn t some sort of publicity play. she real limits to do this him i think she is probably right. democrats need to decide whether or not they want their own donald trump and it seems like they really do. i can t imagine why. she gave a very good speech,py performance artists bore me. she has demonstrated no capacity to govern. she has very little policy knowledge as far as we understand it. i think somebody should be asking those questions if they are serious about having this person soak up 30% of the
means. now, what s your take on it. you avoided writing about him. tell us why. tell us why you think it s now important to do it and what do you think the future holds? well, i avoided writing about him because i didn t think he was serious, both in my business and out of my business, i thought, one, he wasn t going to do this. he flirted with this notion for many, many campaign cycles now. i thought it was a publicity play for him. and then even when he announced, i thought that he was touching a lot of third rails, going after undocumented immigrants and wounded veterans and so forth. or p.o.w.s and so forth, this wasn t going to end well or end quickly. eventually, look, you just have to, you know, see where these things are going. and he was clearly getting a lot of traction very quickly and it became impossible to ignore. as a journalist, you have to go where the story is. he s been the story for almost three solid months. why is he slipping in the polls?