I attest and affirm the following statements are true, accurate and within my personal knowledge. In october 22, 2019 email to thomas, Health Officer San Francisco department of Public Health. One great solution is to set a maximum effective radiated power limit from the face of the antenna shroud at 40mili watts by adding the article to article 25. For Wireless Telecommunications facility that is installed in the public rightsofway or attached to any building or antennas installed at heights lower than 100 feet off the ground, the applicant must install only antennas radios and other supporting equipment that have no chance of exceeding the total of 40 milliwatts of effective radiated power from all the equipment operating at or connected to the specific wtf Wireless Telecommunications facility. 40 watts provides four main benefits. It provides coverage for Telecommunication Service for about onehalf mile from the source antenna. Two, does not effectively prohibit Telecommunication Se
If you have an argument in the city where the elites, the rich people they have plenty of housing. Theres no problem. Its the majority of people, the core worker in the city. The not underclass, middle who is not served by affordable housing, or work for affordable housing, or anything like this. When we do Something Like this this is what bothers me. You are taking an and elation of a dozen items that will serve a group of individuals who by this one type of car that is no less six pensive than 30,000, and extend to over 100,000. Which currently, inclusive of every person in the city is far less than 5 , and if anybody wants to come up with the metric to deny my less than 5 , i would love to hear it. In that, so, we are making a big compromise for an elitist group. If this was while charging stations that was going to charge electronic vehicles, from fiat 500 down to chevy volt, two teslas, i have a different opinion. I have a completely different opinion. Then we are serving a broade
Im julie rosenberg, the boards executive director. Well also be joined by representatives from the city departments that have cases before the board this evening. Up front, we have scott sanchez, acting deputy zoning administrator, representing the Planning Department and excision. We expect joseph duffy, representing the building inspection. Leo is here for San Francisco public works. And we expect chris buck, irvin forester with San Francisco public works, urban forestry. The Board Meeting guidelines are as follows. The board request that you silence all phones and electronic devices. Please carry on conversations in the hallway. The rules of the presentation are follows. People affiliated with the parties must include their comments within the 7 or 3minute period. Members not affiliated have up to three minutes and no rebuttal. Please speak into the microphone. You are asked but not required to submit a speaker card to board staff when you come up to speak. Theyre available on the l
Garage or driveway is a most common example. There is a big way, if the tree can be removed and replaced, we just do we cant do the appraised value because we are not losing a planting site. We are working on actually tightening up our code a little bit to beef it up in the phase of development. Right now, one of the other triggers, when there is traction triggers that reek wire Tree Planting, linear frontage. One tree, or in lieu fee is required per 20 feet of frontage area typical 25 foot wide singlefamily home reek is the tree or in lieu fee. Lets say there are no trees that require planting one tree. That is not triggered with this particular application. If it was we would be looking at all frontages of the entire parcel and add up 20 linear feet and figure out if they are short trees are yet it is Development Impact fee. Again, the average house requires one. That is a trigger that does not involve, or is in play here, but that is in play for driveways. I dont know if ive answere
The order status to phase one, the sfmta is committed to plant 53 new trees prior to the design phase of this project. Architects identified trees which should be removed. So, we are Walking Around 16th street, looking at things making the street scape project more successful. These are the 75 trees that are on the 16th street phase one. Notice the road trees here are trip ficus. Those are the ones a survey rated as being priority removal. In other words, dangerous to people and property. When they marched through and looked at these trees, the ones i picked removal for the healthy one, these eight or ten ficus trees, ignoring all the rest. Here again we have the district ten map of all of the trees, in the vicinity of six teams a phase one. The ones that are not green are also priority removal, and then these are the subject. Going out a little bigger, this is all of district ten. The ones that are not green are also priority removal. Kudos b. U. F. Go after but the ten healthy trees.