favor of the jackson family? from a public relations stand-point, it most certainly d. because their attorney really did a number on the ceo of aeg, the company that hired michael jackson to do the tour. he caught him in a lot of con a contradictions, and everybody looking at michael jackson was sick and pale and had problems. so i think as a public relations standpoint i think clearly the jacksons scored a lot. whether they are winning the case, though, is another matter. and go ahead. no, finish your thought. the reason i say that s. when you step back from the case, the thing you have to remember ultimately is the claim here, they, the concert company, aeg, was negligent in hiring conrad
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20130606:14:06:00
comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
pay any tax in bermuda because there is no corporate tax in bermuda. if that money were moved back to the u.s. they would pay $35 tbers. megyn: don t they have 0 move the money out of bermuda. reporter: they can take it to singapore or china. it doesn t to come back to america. there is no law which says if you make money overseas it must come back here. megyn: now they are getting upset overseas. the french tax authority removed computer files in italy. the tax police searched the come numbers milan offices. they say they don t believe they are paying their fair share of tax. that may or may not be true. but if it s legal how much can they do? reporter: it s perfectly legal. they investigated various companies and put pressure object them from a public
$750,000, they re going to break and the rate is going to budge. the small business argument. if you find caps in deduction and add a compromise on rates which is widely discussed, the white house knows it. the republican leadership has made it all but clear in public. and i just think that that is a republicans part. a big concession. they won, too. it is not there is a public mandate for raising the taxes on the top 2%, but there s not a mandate for nothing else and no spending cuts. and so there really has to be some give on both sides. i think republicans have given. they might, from a public relations standpoint, chris, start coming up with those specific numbers about which loopholes. they might put math on paper to fight back. this would be acceptable and this would not. but obviously yesterday s bid was unacceptable. the white house knew that going in. and it is a time waster. it poisons the well.
point of view, from her perspective, perfect. shepard: i don t, why think i need to ask what it was from the perspective of cnn. guest: no, you don t. shepard: is casey starting a rebuilding campaign? who is to say? guest: now, you would talk with her if you had the chance. it is a news story. this is a first initial re-entry back into the public. no one will be sympathetic to this girl now, but, if you said to me, how should we position hero entry so she minimizes her risk of looking bad or fat or whatever, of sounding bad or sounding incriminating, of sounding not believable, of looking not believable, this is the way i would have done it dr. a public relations standpoint what they did for her, and what cnn agreed to
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.