Department stated that this hearing today, the budget Analyst Report was accurate. I dont think theres any dispute about that. Could you respond to that, to what mr. Rose just said . The budget Analyst Report is accurate, theres tax payment agreement on the property, it provides for only two payments relative to housing and infrastructure because those are the covenants that run with the land. We believe its a good deal for the city and ocii for the reasons stated that are accurately identified in the report and materials to the boards. In terms of the 7 million, what do you think the city got in return for that . I think the city is getting Affordable Housing with no hit whatsoever. You see is paying that so thats otherwise property tax increments that would flow through [inaudible] that money will not flow for infrastructure and Affordable Housing. The totality of that payment now timing issue youre saying . Yes. So the city is getting that and uc is getting to pay smaller amounts. T
This item today. We serve San Francisco residents with Placement Solutions and employers with hiring solutions. We strongly support ucss acquisition of block 33 and 5. And 35. Weve provided Employment Services and now through uewd. As general manager of Mission Hiring Hall ive had direct involvement in placing San Francisco residents and i must say through ucsf and project managers ive definitely witnessed their support of local hire and equal opportunity for San Francisco residents. Ucsf implemented the Community Outreach program back in 2011 where weve led the collaboration and worked closely together with other cbos in the Southeast Community to place San Francisco residents. Residents on mission bay hospital, mission hall, block 25a. Through this process weve connected with various employers and union halls to put people to work and establish relationships. Its not easy working with subtracts and union, but through this process its been a pleasure. To date weve referred we have our
Understanding of this item was called for by supervisor wiener. Thank you mr. Chairman. Just today, you may recall several months ago actually i think it was in Neighborhood Services and safety and we transferred it to budget, we held a hearing to review the overall budget of animal care and control as well as its staffing levels. Animal care and control is one of our basic municipal functions. This agency is our safety net for animals in San Francisco. The agency runs a shelter that does not pick and choose which animals it act accepts. Accepts any animal that is brought that. This is a very Important Agency and weve not done a great job making sure its adequately staffed. We heard in detail a few months ago about the needs of the agency and its budget shord coming. There are not enough, for example, enforcement officers to go out in the field and deal with Animal Welfare issues. The shelter itself, for a period of time, chosed. I think one or two days a week because it simply didnt h
What we said was its a policy matter, thats why we didnt recommend approval because there was this gap of 7 million, which uc would otherwise have to pay over over 30 years, this 39 million. There was an appraiser that computed the net present value and this was compared and the department stated that this hearing today, the budget Analyst Report was accurate. I dont think theres any dispute about that. Could you respond to that, to what mr. Rose just said . The budget Analyst Report is accurate, theres tax payment agreement on the property, it provides for only two payments relative to housing and infrastructure because those are the covenants that run with the land. We believe its a good deal for the city and ocii for the reasons stated that are accurately identified in the report and materials to the boards. In terms of the 7 million, what do you think the city got in return for that . I think the city is getting Affordable Housing with no hit whatsoever. You see is paying that so t