Thank you for reading it. I am glad i wrote it. A little different than past books, but i am excited is finally done. Host so, tell me, how do you define a savior general . Guest the word savior is not is kind of ambiguous. Has to be kind of lost to begin with. Save year as a title means that it should be saved. So great generals, we are not sure that they should have saved the things they did. Trying to do two things, described generals who were put in a position where things did not look too good and they did not stop the war and their cause was worth saving. Host so, tell me a little bit about what inspired you to write a book about save your generals as this moment in time and history . We have this 19th century genre of great captains and leaders. We read about alexander the great and helen campbell. Napoleon and wellington. We are supposed to distill lessons from a military genius. Why did napoleon when . Why was he able to do that . We have the antithesis, the 19th century anato
Now military historian Victor Davis Hanson on his book the savior generals profiles of five military leaders he says saved wars that otherwise would have been lost. Over the next hour, that he is interviewed by Kimberly Kagan founder and president of the institute for the study of war. Host first of all congratulations professor hanson on another great look, the savior generals. Guest thank you for reading it. Im glad i wrote it. A little different than past books but im excited its finally done. Host tell me, how do you define a savior general . Guest you you know the words savior sort of ambiguous. They not only say things to Say Something that has to be lost to begin with and savior with the adjectival ending means it should these saved so great generals like modell or xerxes we are not sure they shouldve say the things they did so is trying to do two things. Describe generals who are put put in a position where things didnt look too good and they didnt start the war and their cause
The microphones well get to you. Please identify yourselves. All right. Thank you. Thank you what was the luck excuse me, the rule of law in regards to this. Well, its very hard to win with this type of strategy. They still didnt manage to pacify afghanistan in the 1980s, even though they were wanting to kill a million people. Because the nazis and the soviets offered nothing positive. They offered no reason why the people of yugoslavia or afghanistan would support them. They offered nothing but death and desolation it was not a winning dratted he. People want to see the rule of law. Not necessarily our law, but there law. That is something that our people respond positively to. Rather from stealing from them and raping their daughters, they will be more likely to support those soldiers. I would argue that this is a crucial element of successful counterinsurgency. Right here . Hello. How do we do this . We have done this before twice in iraq and afghanistan. There have been. Periods of
Early Surveys Reflect Public Opinion on Milei s Initial Policies riotimesonline.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from riotimesonline.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.