you can go, in this part of the state, to an entirely separate part of the state. yellow stone river where public lands are just as important. people come from all over the world to fish. is there a difference? i don t believe there s any real difference on public land issues in montana. we all believe in public land. it s a question of whether you want the state to manage or the feds. who should control public land? the state. tell me why, sir. the feds, everything is done in d.c. nobody knows what goes on out here. i think the state is more qualified to control public lands than the federal government sitting on their ass in washington, d.c. reporter: folks do believe if somehow we transferred the public lands to the state that everybody would be involved. they would have a much more direct access to the people making decisions about management policies on the land. the truth of the matter is we can t afford to run our office
washington, d.c. he s voting most of the chime with chuck schumer and liberal democrats. you can go here from hunting on horseback and to the river where public lands are just as important. is there a difference between rosendale and tester? i don t believe there s an issue on public land issues in the state of montana. we all believe in public land. it s just a question of whether the state to manage it or the fed. who should control public lands? the state. tell me why, sir. because the feds, there s too much bureaucracy. everything done in d.c., nobody knows what goes on out here. i think the state is more qualified to control public lands than the federal government sitting on their ass in washington, d.c. people believe if he somehow transferred the lanes to the public state that everything would be solved, they d have
mountains. that means hunting and fishing. here the way you live your life outdoors matters. people detest hunter because he doesn t have a hunting license. rosen dale is from maryland. he voted for the state lands. maryland and other states bought it all up and they blocked it all off. you say maryland because of rosendale, right? claims to be a cattle rancher, doesn t have a brand. doesn t own cattle. he portrays himself one way when he s in the state of montana, but when he s in washington, d.c., he s voting with chuck schumer and liberal democrats. people call montana the last best place. that s how important public lands are. you can go in this part of the state hunting on horseback to an entirely separate part of the state to yellow stone river where public lands are just as important . people come from all over the world to fish. is there a difference on tester and rosendale on public lands? i don t think there is a difference in public land issues
he voted for the state lands. maryland and other states bought it all up and they blocked it all off. you say maryland because of rosendale, right? claims to be a cattle rancher, doesn t have a brand. doesn t own cattle. he portrays himself one way when he s in the state of montana, but when he s in washington, d.c., he s voting with chuck schumer and liberal democrats. people call montana the last best place. that s how important public lands are. you can go in this part of the state hunting on horseback to an entirely separate part of the state to yellow stone river where public lands are just as important . people come from all over the world to fish. is there a difference on tester and rosendale on public lands? i don t think there is a difference in public land issues in the state of montana. we all believe in public land. it is all a question whether you want the state to manage it or the feds. who should control public
as far as that goes. how about the one that allows people to vote at 18. is that a good change? yeah. i think that s fine. you bet. so how do you decide which changes you like and which you don t like? obviously we ve gone through an evolution over time. black people can vote. they can t vote. they were slaves at the time of the constitution. that was in the constitution. they were counted as two-thirds of a person but they didn t get to vote themselves at that time. the constitution writers thought that was okay. you don t think it was okay, do you to have slaves? chris, let me sum it up this way. anything that is in the constitution today that is properly interpreted is fine by me and fine by the people in idaho. it s when president obama gets outside of the united states constitution that i have a problem. with the health care bill, cap and trade, a lot of the out in idaho we have a lot of public land issues. i don t believe that the federal