was a wider net they were casting. why? because it s unavoidable that it would be a wider net. if you re going after bad guys but you don t have any kind guys but you don t have any kind of sense of restraint governing you, if you re saying basically i can challenge and go after this guy living in this country and all the communications around him then there is no restraints on you except for maybe public opinion when the public figures it out but the public didn t know about it for ten years. so if you don t operate with that constitutional restraint you ll be conducting dragnet surveillance. they call it collateral damage, deal with it. james clapper said we don t collect the stuff with ittingly. that s the word he used. actually they do. if you re an american who happens to be in a chat room, same chat room populated
doctor. period. now, he is saying, well, you might have to change your doctor or pay more to keep your doctor because of changes in the network. that is a significant admission that the airtight promise he made to americans was not true, is not true and it is completely unacceptable. yet another lie told to the american people in trying to sell a bill that the public didn t want in the first place. let me give a chance to explain this: the president s huge theme in both campaigns was transparency. did he know at the time that he first proposed obamacare that folks would not be able to keep their doctor? or they may as he is saying, have to change doctors? he repeated it a number of times. the american people and those who voted for obamacare believed people could keep their doctor.
it. i think the people recognize it s time for the government to tighten its belt a little bit. i wasn t the cut in spending. it was the reduction in the increase in spending, even though the president misled the public into thinking the republicans are taking food out of mouths of babes. public didn t buy it. the polls are always a few weeks behind the events. now we see the people reacting to the government scare tactics of a few weeks ago. neil: thank you, judge. the man who laid it out. said it would happen. and he has been hungry. pizza smells terrific. neil: it dot. don t you touch . the pizza guy celebrating. [ male announcer ] how can power conmption in china,
negotiating prices. ted nugent is associated with the phrase wango tango. how seriously do you take him? it is a typical hyper boughly. every lefty says they will leave the country if a republican is elected. it is typical exaggeration. i don t think anybody could think ted nugent was going to take his bow on to the field and assassinate the president. that doesn t seem likely. were knew nugent s comments dangerous it could insight other violence because ted nugent was so outspoken with the right to bear arms. maybe the crazy followers and the fans of ted nugent, we know him more now as a public didn t. pundint. i agree with you about the taxpayer service and secret service. they wanted to warn him and
rosenstein. rosenstein offers to write this memo. the memo is ultimately the main argument the white house uses to explain the comey firing. they stand on the white house lawn the night of the firing, and they read from the letter and explain to people that comey had to go because he was too harsh on hillary clinton. if you re robert mueller and his associates and you now realize or you ve realized now for months perhaps that rosenstein felt he was used and he didn t feel i was being accurate and at all honest about the reasons for the firing, what would that tell you about obstruction of justice? well, mueller has known this probably for a year. this is nothing that but the public didn t know it. the public did not know it. this is the thing. this is a very important period of time. it s a little more than a week between when comey is fired and mueller is appointed. and what trump defenders and trump s lawyers would say, they d say, well, rosenstein was more than happy to be