i m just asking that he was wrong if he did or wrong if he didn t. if he hadn t said anything, the report came out, they would say he influenced the election because he didn t talk about it and didn t say it. and now they re saying he influenced it because he released it. what was he to do? and also he is right. i think hind light is always 20/20. maybe he shouldn t have done it, but i think he has a point. do you disagree with that, scott? i do disagree. i think that close to an election, when you have somebody part of the unelected pu bureaucracy making a decision that close to our election, yeah, i think it was improper. what do you think you would be saying now if hillary clinton was president and then this report came out today and it showed that while there was an investigation that was reopened into hillary clinton s e-mails and they never talked about it, what do you think you would be saying today, scott?