the proud boys trial, as much as we would love to see him cross-examined by prosecutors. yeah, in my head, i was thinking more it would be like that scene from a few good men where he s like i ordered the code red, i ordered the code red. him telling the proud boys, yeah, i said go to the capitol. i don t agree to get that as much as we want to. jill, the legal experts who wrote the new york times op-ed believe indictment against trump or likely in georgia, that is the case everyone is focusing in on right now. it just depends on whether fani willis takes a narrow or broad approach, that could include rico charges. what is your take? what is the play here? she has a choice between those two, and she has been very successful with rico, racketeering and corrupt organization charges. there is an appeal to that, because juries like to see the big narrative. they like to understand how it fits in, something not just in
so, i do not think we will see donald trump hit the stand in the proud boys trial, as much as we would love to see him cross-examined by prosecutors. yeah, in my head, i was thinking more it would be like that scene from a few good men where he s like i ordered the code red, i ordered the code red. him telling the proud boys, yeah, i said go to the capitol. i don t agree to get that as much as we want to. jill, the legal experts who wrote the new york times op-ed believe indictment against trump or likely in georgia, that is the case everyone is focusing in on right now. it just depends on whether fani willis takes a narrow or broad approach, that could include rico charges. what is your take? what is the play here? she has a choice between those two, and she has been very successful with rico, racketeering and corrupt organization charges. there is an appeal to that, because juries like to see the
this in this single case signals that smith s office is looking very closely at the ex presidents inner circle, his trusted confidants, which means we could still see a sabrina for trump himself in this case as it moves forward. but for now, as of tonight, the only subpoena for trump is, again, from that proud boys trial. lawyers from the militia group are likely trying to pin the blame for their clients behavior on donald trump. and while it is true that trump bears much of the responsibility for inciting the deadly riot on january 6th, he did not work alone. jacob glick research the proud boys and other january 6th agitators extensively when he served as investigative counsel during the second impeachment of donald trump for inciting the attack. he has continued that research to this day in a new piece for lawfare titled the long dissent to insurrection. he explores the various ways that the proud boys and other
this in this single case signals that smith s office is looking very closely at the ex presidents inner circle, his trusted confidants, which means we could still see a sabrina for trump himself in this case as it moves forward. but for now, as of tonight, the only subpoena for trump is, again, from that proud boys trial. lawyers from the militia group are likely trying to pin the blame for their clients behavior on donald trump. and while it is true that trump bears much of the responsibility for inciting the deadly riot on january 6th, he did not work alone. jacob glick research the proud boys and other january 6th agitators extensively when he served as investigative counsel during the second impeachment of donald trump for inciting the attack. he has continued that research to this day in a new piece for lawfare titled the long dissent to insurrection. he explores the various ways that the proud boys and other right-wing gangs, both self radicalized against democracy and towards po