38 and have been pumping. that is because other figures have been used by the tories to get that overall total. therefore, the £2000 figure of supported rises under a future labour government, a figure which derives from the overall total cannot be attributed to the treasury. what happens if you take out the non treasury costed elements of the tory dossier? did he verify it has calculated it is these items at the bottom, the green prosperity plan, fair pay agreement on social care and ukraine support, and they add up to £22 billion, a very large proportion of the extra labour spending claims by the conservatives. by the assumptions that into the costing of labour policies that the treasury produced was based on the sums given to them by a conservative appointed special advisers and so those assumptions are questionable. overall, we have a host of reasons to be dubious about this £2000 per household tax claim which though dominated the debate last night. let s talk now to the
document advisers. there is an element in the document which refers to what is labour s document which refers to what is labour s green prosperity plan, as they call labour s green prosperity plan, as they call it labour s green prosperity plan, as they call it. labour say they have a means they call it. labour say they have a means of they call it. labour say they have a means of funding that. and there was another means of funding that. and there was another claim, which is not part of what another claim, which is not part of what the another claim, which is not part of what the treasury did, that the think what the treasury did, that the think tank what the treasury did, that the think tank the institute for government have looked at, which they have government have looked at, which they have publicly said, there is only one they have publicly said, there is only one element to all of this, but that was only one element to all of this, but that was misleading. w
but it s a little bit of controlled emotion because there s a lot of phases of this mission, and we just completed the first one. you know, pre launch and launch is just the first part of this. we now have to get to iss, we have to dock, we have to do docking ops, we have to undock, we have to do reentry and we have to land. starliner is a brand new spacecraft that sits on top of the rocket, and this is its first test flight with a crew on board. it s been built to transport crew and cargo to and from the international space station. it ll take around a day to get there and the mission will last just over a week. and when it gets back to earth, it ll be with a bump in what s going to be the first hard capsule landing for a us mission. along with space x, they ll now be two private sector firms taking astronauts to the space station. if boeing s test flight goes well.
many others are still searching for loved ones missing since the al shifa raid. throughout the day, commemorative events have been taking place both here in the uk and in france. we are on the eve of the 80th anniversary of the d day landings 6 june 191m the day that british, american, canadian and french troops landed on sword, juno, gold, omaha and utah beaches in normandy, taking the germans by surprise in what was the largest ever amphibious invasion. it changed the course of world war two. throughout the day, there have been celebrations in the uk and in france. danjohnson is in portsmouth where commemorations began. this was a day of polished national pride and shining service medals, but it was a chance to speak of one of history s turning points with those who fought to secure it. we fired the first shot on d day. the very first? 0n the battleship, yes, the very first shot. we all did our bit. if we didn t fit in our slot, things wouldn t have worked out, would they? this was a
auditors. and she records them as saying horizon is a real risk for us . does it capture data accurately ? cases of fraud, suspects suggest it s a systems problem . aren t those things linked together? well, clearly now they are absolutely linked together. clearly, on the face of the page, they re linked together. one follows the next. they were not, they weren t linked in that way, in my mind at that time. that s a very significant piece of information to receive, isn t it? yes. but there was also plenty of crucial information that she says she didn t know about, and neither did her board. like bombshell legal advice about prosecutions not shared by post office executives. why do you think they did it? i don t know. i really don t know. i mean, i am a believer if i can use this phrase in the cock up rather