eugene, let s listen to that moment okay? robert durst was wearing a hot mic. he took a break, he went into the bathroom and he is talking to himself in what sounds like an apparent confession. listen to this. what the hell are you doing? killed them all. of course. killed them all, of course. do you think that s going to be admissible in court? i think it s going to be admissible. i would argue that some people have a compulsion almost to confess, this guy is haunted by this case. that s the prosecutor side of me. i think the argument is clear, in this private place where he didn t think he was being heard. you have to look inside of his mind and his mind is a guilty mind for the crimes he has committed. you think the jury will hear sanaa. i think the jury will hear that. this comes from a harvard law professor who believes it will
if they are not a news organization like you are and they are in fact just a political front, all of that is contributions that was concealed was never reported and so forth, so pecker and the ami and of course the enquirer are exposed and the number of stories that michael avenatti is suggesting are there, i think there is a good chance they are legion because of the relation over a long time between trump and mr. pecker. so this is a this is a real nightmare from the trump side of the equation, from the prosecutor side of the equation, this is a tet onic drift against the trump organization. for both of you, being such smart legal minds here, as you hear this story develop and from us, our perspective as news folks, you hear about a safe kept at the national enquirer full of documents and what are they about? hush money payments supposedly, potentially damaging stories that were killed. and so barbara, you must be