El Gobierno se desmarca del coronel Nicolás Murga, amigo del emérito, "no es competencia de Defensa" elconfidencialdigital.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from elconfidencialdigital.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
strategy or whether or not they feel they don t need to we ll find out. so what do you think, kerri? he was listed as a potential witness. the prosecutor said they re not required to put him on, it is hard to tell whether or not they legitimately are leaning towards not putting him on the stand, or if the prosecutor put that out there to keep the defense on their meals a little bit. in their opening statement they went to heavy against gates. so it is hard to tell if this is more substance or strategy as well. i agree the case itself is really a documents case. while the witnesses provide context and expectation, the real meat of it is in the
too, want justice for tamir, then suggested going through the civil system. how common is that for a prosecutor to say go the civil route? this is a prosecutor who made it clear from the start he didn t think it was a crime. if that s how he feels, he shouldn t have presented the grand jury in the first place. what if they did return charges? he would say thanks, but i disagree with this. this is why people are losing faith. it seems like a charade where some prosecutors, not all, are pulling in the grand jury to cover for their decision. if you didn t think it was a crime, it wasn t fair to put this before a grand jury. this was a pelt gun you could see as a threat. the officers pulled up and made a split-second decision. a tragic mistake, the prosecutor called it. i don t think this prosecutor put to rest the questions of whether this was fairly and independently investigated.
not with this lady who clearly has problems and who has a history of problems, but why would a prosecutor put her in front of the grand jury? so, al, here s my theory. he was trying to either, a, overwhelm the grand jurors by jumping on them with all this conflicting information, so they d just kind of throw up their hands and have no choice but not to indict. or he was trying to feed them any information that corroborated officer wilson s story, no matter how ludicrous the witness is. either way, it s not consistent with an investigation that s conducted in good faith and with integrity. so you gave me two choices here. either he was trying to overwhelm them to come with a no bill or either he was putting up witnesses to help darren wilson, the policeman. so either charge, you re saying, as a former prosecutor, that you feel he was trying not to get an indictment. al, i would have gotten an indictment if i would have been
okay, i did it. she went along with that one. i m not going to defend her on that ground. she lied to police and lied to all of us, i wish she could do time because of that. but i think this is a positive thing that she pled guilty because the alleged victim and the family of the alleged victim was onboard with her. a prosecutor put that teenager on the stand. megyn: the victim and his family were on her side. that happens sometimes. sometimes the victim and the family are on the defendant s side. as the prosecutor you don t dumb the case because of that.