army special operations command spokesman. they say his immediate commander determined that sufficient evidence exist to warrant the preferal of charges against him. if they knew it and if the interview didn t reveal anything new and this was a closed case, why are they going after their way to go after what can only be described as an american hero? that s a quhe you would haved have to ask them. the prosecutor intimated to me that they have new evidence. but this allegation happened in 2010, in february of 2010. the army became aware of it in 2011 and it s been investigated the entire time. what new evidence could there possibly be from 2010. that s the question they ll have to answer. absolutely. we re going to follow this case. talk to me about the larger double standard. we fight an enemy that hides in the shadows.