prosecution on facts remotely similar to these facts, and we know that the prosecution is just attempting to imflame the jury here by playing to the love people had for elizabeth edward their trying to persuade the jury that this guy deserves to go to jail. if that were true, a lot of politicians have a lot to worry about. well said, i you want you to take a minute, give the prosecution argument, at least. their argument is that this is really a campaign contribution because it helped clean the guys record or prevent more rather than prevent him from a scandal, from the public knowing about this affair. my question is, anything you do for a candidate, is that a contribution to his campaign i wonder? is anything any money spent by a third party automatically a campaign