Because it depends. if there is a conviction, that is something that can be appealed on the law. if there were legal mistakes that were made, if the jury was instructed improperly on the law, if evidence was kept out that was material, improperly, those kinds of things can be appealed, and it can take quite some time, and so there is recourse there, so really complicated, but let me just say thank you so much to our incredible team. it was really great to be here girding out with lawyers, and all of us having been in the courtroom. thanks so much for your perception and insight and personal stories and thank all of you for spending the last hour with us. if you can t get enough trump news, and you want to dig even deeper, try the msnbc podcast, prosecuting donald trump, hosted by mary mccord and me.
Because it depends. if there is a conviction, that is something that can be appealed on the law. if there were legal mistakes that were made, if the jury was instructed improperly on the law, if evidence was kept out that was material, improperly, those kinds of things can be appealed, and it can take quite some time, and so there is recourse there, so really complicated, but let me just say thank you so much to our incredible team. it was really great to be here girding out with lawyers, and all of us having been in the courtroom. thanks so much for your perception and insight and personal stories and thank all of you for spending the last hour with us. if you can t get enough trump news, and you want to dig even deeper, try the msnbc podcast, prosecuting donald trump, hosted by mary mccord and me.
So, katie, from your spot in the courtroom, what you think of stormy daniels? how did she do? she did a spectacular job. stormy daniels testimony did not come across as rehearsed. there is authenticity to her, whether you liked it or not because of the sincerity, it did not seem like she had rehearsed or practiced her testimony. she had prepared and that s a big difference but she prepared and she did a great job and she knew that even though i call it a detour, not a sideshow, but a detour, the case took a detour to explore what happened between her and donald trump, because they had to create the foundation of why the payment was made and how it got to the level of the business records been falsified, but you needed to have that dialogue and what was important is everybody likes to say this is a paper case but it is about humanity
And those surrogates are tweeting from the courtroom. we can prove that given the timestamps on their tweets and their often doing it to circumvent the gag order, which one of them admitted on another media outlet last week so there are some special arrangements here. they should ve been made for the former president security and yet they have been rampantly abused by him and his friends. at concluding the group of people from congress wearing identical uniforms which were mini-means of the former president. all former presidents are given secret service, so it s not that donald trump is being treated differently. the last question we have michelle from the netherlands and she asks, is the decision of the jury final? well, welcome to being in the panel of lawyers because this is the kind of question i lawyers have a great name,
Right? we can go on and on. january 6, climate change, the election, the trial. but they are affirmed in their miss belief constantly, and they think we don t know what is reality. this is why feel like the whole felonies thing should and hopefully does cut through to a silent majority of people who are like you know what? i am in earth one resident but i am just not that proud of it. for me, a bridge too far is when we have a convicted felon surrounded by felons being, again, in the white house. i just feel like i want to simplify it down to do you want the felony guy or anyone else? but donald trump wanted more than his base, wouldn t he be doing everything possible to court the nikki haley voter? he disrespected nikki haley in every possible way, yet still she endorsed him.