these likes are not alerting anyone to danger. they re done to embarrass donald trump and subvert his governance. it s a gutless way to win. some of them are not prosecute you can t property them. prosecutable. likes that are embarrassing aren t necessarily crimes. i have embarrassing likes. that s not issue. . richard, you enjoy the likes. [laughing] we have had a democrat on the air the other day, matthew waters, applauding the likes, says bring it on. do you think that that is hypocritical? no, i think the likes are problematic. sadly, what makes it worse for the president, a lot of these likes, are likes coming from his white house, likes from his campaign staff, people who worked on his campaign, people who work in the communications office. those are worse. those are the folks who should be endeared to you. your most trusted individual, work in the west wing, leaking
who can find somebody who claims to have been abducted by space aliens or that same prosecutor getting struck by lightning in the same place twice than you do finding a prosecutor who can actually find somebody who s guilty of prosecutable voter fraud. it almost never happens and never has happened to any extent that has been statistically significant. so either they re on that fool s errant again, and republicans have done that a few times. george w. bush was the last one to do it. or they re preparing to suppress votes, because all the data that they have asked for is what folks would use to suppress votes. and the people they have stacked this commission with are literally the all stars of voter suppression. and that s where the concern comes from. i want to get to another big story out of baltimore, that being the body cam video released allegedly showing a police officer inadvertently recording himself planting drugs and then appearing to, well, discover that evidence and that l
twitter is taking up a lot of oxygen. he did so today. while all that s going on the president himself will head to paris, france, tomorrow in lieu of the latest edition in the russian meddling saga. here to give her take on all of it is martha mccallum. harris, how you doing? harris: great, thank you. today you figure the focus on james comey. that s the man he s replacing. a lot of questions though about donald trump jr. and what s been going on there. also just how this man, christopher wray, would fit into the political landscape. what was your take on it? obviously, what s going on with don jr. and the e-mail saga is just the latest sort of edge in this story. lot of people out there who believe that it points to some sort of cooperation, collusion isn t something that s prosecutable. but perhaps cooperation between the trump administration and the russian. when you go back to what donald
you re being very careful here with your words. so there s a specific case. the law has a distinction between the two. because legal experts we ve talked to on treason said we ve got to be at war for that country for actually the specific definition of treason to be applied here. that s my understanding. but i really think we need to focus you kept saying trechry. on the disloyalty of choosing to put yourself in a position where you re going to owe a debt of gratitude to vladimir putin. this could be possibly good for the united states somehow? it s inconceivable. is this something that s prosecutable? oh, i don t know that that s prosecutable, but it is subject to it s political analysis and the body positively particular of whether or not this resonates with the body politic and with congress. i ve got to leave it there. thanks very much. thank you very much. when we come back, what s the smart thing for republicans up for election to do?
impeachment offenses, whether or not republican or prosecutable. prosecutable, whether or not republicans would draft articles of impeachment because of that. but there is already there there. there is there that you think is already there, firing people, or a midterm election. those are the remedies we have for that. i do think there is plenty of loose talk about ways to remove a president. not just political backlash for people but particularly unhealthy for the country, because there s many people that did elect this president. i don t agree with their decision, but this is what happened. i think making those folks feel more alienated by jumping to the punch is bad. but this is another self-infliction of the white