i think that technically amounts to, in terms of prosecutable, indomitable, convicted of a crime. but, the obstruction of the official proceeding does seem, quite clear, what they have so far? the obstruction statute is by the government with defending, corruptly, is to interfere or block in an official proceeding. you can do that by lying under oath, and before a congressional investigation and it is an ultimate serious act, and it was an ultimate attempt to obstruct the ultimate for proceeding. this is the official proceeding, necessary, before the transfer of power in the democracy. they were trying, through every
was it a signal to the parties to try to come to some agreement as to what might be safe pounds and i think the district attorney s motion today responding in kind to what senator graham did, he is still seeking full squash will, not identifying spaces that the law said would be outside of the bounds of the speech and debate clause. so the da responded in kind of, that all of her requests are valid under the law and prosecutable, so the district judge has a decision in front of her. we ll see what happens with the next ruling. is there anything i, don t see anything lindsey graham s filings that he agrees and circumstance in which the united states senator would have to testify before a grand jury, including as an actual specific suspect of a crime?
district attorney s motion today responding in kind to what senator graham did, he is still seeking full quashal, not identifying spaces that the law said would be outside of the bounds of the speech and debate clause. so the da responded in kind of, that all of her requests are allowable under the law and prosecutable, so the district judge has a decision in front of her. we ll see what happens with the next ruling. is there anything i, don t see anything in lindsey graham s filings that he agrees and circumstance in which the united states senator would have to testify before a grand jury, including as an actual specific suspect of a crime? i think that s right, and again, i think the da in her response made that point. that the request was so broad, and in her view does not recognize the context,
would regard this as a prosecutable, and edible case. those are not my words. they re the words of federal prosecutor as whereas homeland security jeh johnson. ance coverage, you could be working this out yourself. so get allstate. meta portal go. look professional. even if you don t feel it. meta portal. the smart video calling device. - right on time! - of course. that makes work from home work for you. so, shall we get started? a monster was attacking but the team remained calm. because with miro, they could problem solve together, and find the answer that was right under their nose. or. his nose. moderate to severe eczema still disrupts my skin. despite treatment it disrupts my skin with itch.
trump to act, jeffrey, and he just didn t. doing nothing it might not be a crime, but does it say something about his motives and his intentions for the 6th? is that is that prosecutable? you know where i m going with this. yeah, it s all it s all part of the issue of the state of mind. just to go back to our state of mind on january 6th, you know, we were all either covering or watching what was going on. this was a life or death struggle. everybody knew it at the time. i mean, it was a tremendously violent confrontation in the capitol, and there was one person in the united states who could have shut it down, and it was donald trump. and 187 minutes, that s a long time. that s, you know, more than three hours that he let it go on. and included in that three hours