Principles, get these concepts into the hands of the people who are on the ground and ultimately to get it possibly into the ashto green book and state design guidance such as the california highway design manual will be part of the further evolution of these designs, which i hope make our streets safer. Thank you. Mr. Strassner. Howard strassner for the last time today. Thank you. [laughter] there are many guides and cookbooks. I hope there arent too many conflicts in the better ones. I want to speak to an overriding thing. Whenever were ready to spend a nickel on a street to improve bicycles or paving or pedestrian safety, we also have to do the necessary to make you need run faster, more reliable. These things have to happen. If were spending this money, now is the time to put in the best bulk and which side of the stop light, all that stuff has to be considered. If we do these things separately were going to get in real trouble tearing thing. I hope you can take care of that. Now,
No member of the public. The board . Motion to approve. Is there a second . Second. Discussion . All favor say aye. Aye. The ayes have it. Okay. We have two or three other things to do and ask [speaker not understood] to go back to item 14. Directors, its been observed that there was a procedural oversight in your vote on item 14. It was a resolution, the whereas clause of the resolution approving item 14 contemplated that you would make a motion and suspend your rules relating to notice of a new fee. The board has a rule that provides certain amount of published notice before a new fee is adopted that is in addition to legal requirements. This is under your board rule. Its not requirement of law. And the notice provided for item 14 in some way not 100 consistent. I think it was not as early as contemplated. And, so, it would be appropriate for you not to make that motion to suspend the rules [multiple voices] motion. Second. Any further discussion . Say yee. Aye. [speaker not understo
No one submitted a card to speak. [speaker not understood]. [speaker not understood] the proliferation of companies continue. Anything you want to highlight . I think director reiskin said it well given the hour. Okay. No member of the public. The board . Motion to approve. Is there a second . Second. Discussion . All favor say aye. Aye. The ayes have it. Okay. We have two or three other things to do and ask [speaker not understood] to go back to item 14. Directors, its been observed that there was a procedural oversight in your vote on item 14. It was a resolution, the whereas clause of the resolution approving item 14 contemplated that you would make a motion and suspend your rules relating to notice of a new fee. The board has a rule that provides certain amount of published notice before a new fee is adopted that is in addition to legal requirements. This is under your board rule. Its not requirement of law. And the notice provided for item 14 in some way not 100 consistent. I thin
Go ahead. I agree with supervisor wieners aide that that in his words this is not necessarily a one time issue but i think the intent of the legislation is to address the one time situation that we have here and i fully intend if we pass this at the end of the year to pass legislation at the direction of the Elections Commission to rescind this because this is i think a longer standing policy conversation that we ought to have about what is the most appropriate way for us to educate voters, but i am really concerned that if voters receive a handbook that has the full text of everything but on one measure have no text whatsoever, not even 20 pages worth. I can understand why 100 pages is an issue but not even 20 pages. I think that will create more questions and providing the first 20 pages shows what were talking about. Let me also say when it comes to the ballot the 20 pages are the first five pages of the ordinance in question and page of supportive document so youre getting the gift