They are affiliated and seven to three minutes. Members of the public have up to three minutes each to address the board. For jurisdiction there is no rebuttal. Given that the board has a vacancy three votes are required to grant an appeal or jurisdiction request. If you have a question send us an email. Public access and participation is paramount to the board and makes the hearing process. To enable participation its it broadcasting and streaming live. To watch the hearing on tv go to sf. Gov. It will be rebroadcast on channel 26. A link to the live stream is found on our webpage. Public comment can be provided in two ways. Join the zoom meeting by computer. Head to our website sf. Gov. Org or callin by telephone. Call 16698900. Again, sf. Gov is broadcasting the phone number and access instructions across the bottom of the screen dial star nine which is similar to raising your hands. You will have three minutes and our legal clerk will provide you with a warning. There is a delay be
For rebuttal. They are affiliated and seven to three minutes. Members of the public have up to three minutes each to address the board. For jurisdiction there is no rebuttal. Given that the board has a vacancy three votes are required to grant an appeal or jurisdiction request. If you have a question send us an email. Public access and participation is paramount to the board and makes the hearing process. To enable participation its it broadcasting and streaming live. To watch the hearing on tv go to sf. Gov. It will be rebroadcast on channel 26. A link to the live stream is found on our webpage. Public comment can be provided in two ways. Join the zoom meeting by computer. Head to our website sf. Gov. Org or callin by telephone. Call 16698900. Again, sf. Gov is broadcasting the phone number and access instructions across the bottom of the screen dial star nine which is similar to raising your hands. You will have three minutes and our legal clerk will provide you with a warning. There
U process, i believe that we also could have some discretion in how quickly we would process that perm mit permit removed. Im going to refer to the Zoning Administrator on this. the tenant issue is always chachallenging because obviously its allowing it out side the purview of the code. If its not legalized if it is required to be removed and theres an existing tenant that does become an enforcement situation if we have an unauthorized unpermitted unit that may have life safety deficiencies. We generally want that unit to be vacated. Aobviously theres challenges with an existing tenant. We want to be open to options there. We dont have an open ended option to allow residency in an unauthorized unit and it may be something that the City Attorney wants to speak to further in terms of this issue and conflicts between our codes and other City Ordinances relating to renting units and occupancy. commissioner johnson. one second. I thought i heard them asking what happens if we do approve thi
It will not attract a larger area around the field. They say theyre requesting usage so its not to restrict feud planned or change use of this field. It leave open for all sorts of use in the future. Disrupting our family time and we havent even have kinner together so please i am hoping ha we will not approve this permit. You have 40 questions remaining. Good evening, honourable commissioners, my name is Molly Mcfadden and im an alum new as well as an allumni representative for the class of 2014. And im a resident of the sunset district and has been my life of 24 years. And im calling in support many of which were hinder. They have completed the field after practise and locking away our this was inconvenient and scary as a young woman who stands at 53 and 115 pounds walk to go my car in the dark. Our students and coached walked me to my car. If you approval this project, all students and Staff Members as well as our neighbours can feel safe walking own to their vehicles and. You are 4
You know, the deck does meet our Design Guidelines, its set back fairly substantially from the adjacent Property Lines. I know the board here has heard quite a few appeals about deck yards and privacy concerns, and some projects that do have the deck right up at the Property Lines, and in this case, its set back from all lot lines. It is a small lot, and, you know, perhaps for the size of the lot, it is a generous size deck, but it is within reason for a deck in San Francisco as weve seen it, and it does meet our Design Guidelines. So with that, im available for any questions that the board may have. Just confirming, its code compliant, does not need modifications, and im available for questions. Clerk okay. Just i dont see any questions from any of the commissioners, so we will move onto chief building inspector duffy. Do you have anything further . No, nothing further. Im available for any questions. Clerk commissioners, this matter is submitted we do have a question. Vice president