i thought, whoa. you know, some people who are conspiracy-minded, it s very hard to, you know, discuss certain situations like this. even when you try to break it down against trump. some of this, i must say, it s new territory. we ll see. errol, i wanted to ask you about a tweet by a top russian parliamentarian alexi pushkov. all accusations against russia are based on confidence and assumptions. the u.s. were just as confidence of the wmds hussein had. what does it say to you that a russian parliament member, though, is mirroring what a president-elect is asserting? you know, it s almost a cliche. but it does sound more proper coming in sort of a russian accent, just how swarmy and dishonest of a propaganda smear
issues. here s what he said in 1999 about background checks. we think it is reasonable to provide mandatory instant criminal background checks for every sale at every gun show. no loopholes anywhere for anyone. we do not because the fact is the law right now is a failure the way it s working. the fact is you have 76,000-some people that have been denied under the present law. only 44 were prosecuted. you re letting them go. they are walking the streets. shameless. he s also said previously that schools should be gun-free zones. now he says even in the school should be armed. the man does any u-turn that suits him. yet he s winning this war in washington. why is he winning? why does the nra continue to wield this power? i have a tweet here from ted new gent. ask michael moore this. will you ever admit your bowling for columbine lie is a propaganda smear against the good families of the nra and the