place. when he meets, he will use his style and i respect that, whatever that style is to make sure mr. putin knows that america will not take step backwards and will not allow him to infiltrate and get involved in political process and get involved in telling people that elected officials are not done legitimately and he wants to get them done and change it through propaganda machines. we are not going to tolerate that and i m sure in the president s own way he will get that across. i have hope in that. we saw during the president s first overseas trip that many did not feel putin s intentions, where do you feel in comparison to that? well, i mean, everyone has their style. we are trying to second-guess how i might approach a problem
saying i don t know what the third party nation was that provided this to the white house that was divulged to the russians. it s possible that they could hear it at the lower level. i doubt seriously it would come up in face-to-face meetings with president trump and benjamin netanyahu. it probably would have already occurred by other means but i don t think it will be a major sort of issue when they sit down to talk. i notice with interest today, i m sure you did as well, president vladimir putin, generously offering to provide a transcript of the meeting to help out the president. it struck me that this was state-sponsored trolg state-sponsored trolling by the russian president. i m not sure whether he talks about a transcript or record but i suspect he s enjoying this immensely, this whole issue. he s probably getting a lot out of it and the propaganda machines in russia are probably turning it out as well. it was more tongue in cheek, i
correspondent olivia sterns. explain the pressure on social media companies to fight the isis propaganda machines. is there an assumption they are doing too little? it feels like everybody woke up no the fact that social media is a critical front, a critical battleground in the fight against isis. so yesterday we saw two senators, both sides of the aisle, republican senator dianne feinstein and republican senator richard byrd, both propose a bill to legally require social media companies, so twitter, facebook, youtube, to report any red flags to officials. this is both difficult and controversial and is very difficult because the social media companies say they are simply inundated, for example, youtube took down 15 million videos just last year. and it s very controversial because it puts the tech companies, you know, in the private sector as the ash or
meantime, they are winning this propaganda war online with many muslims around the world. some of whom are getting radicalized due to this propaganda thing that s going on. i think that this now, why should you dismiss the possibility of what s being of what senator graham is fearful of here? and joining us now is washington post editorial columnist david ignatius. following up on chuck s point, i have seen under secretary of state condi rice, colin powell, hillary clinton, and now john kerry, the failure to go up against al qaeda and now isis propaganda machines. should we just get out of the business and disarm ourselves? should we contract it out to the silicon valley experts? the judgment that people are making this week that the u.s. is not a credible source of counter-isis messaging,
anything to investigate this to do anything at all until the video came out. once the video came out, then what happened is they all realized uh-oh, we ve got a problem. and they fire the officer and do everything else. to me this is an epidemic problem. it happens all over the country. i ve got at least ten of these cases in the office right now where they have killed where police have killed people with equally ludicrous stories like this and the public officials just accept it and the local journalists just become the house organs for the police basically, the propaganda machines for the police. this is an abject lesson for why you cannot believe the bs that comes out of the police departments when there s these kind of shootings. dan, when you look at this tape would an officer have any valid reason for shooting