some tries to cast doubt on the the explosive testimony of former white house aide cassidy hutchinson, he tweeted this, i know her, i don t think she s lying. and here is what he said when he announced his resignation. two things i think caught me as i was watching yesterday. number one, the president had always in the past had sort of thrown a hyperbolic ideas and say why don t we do x and everybody knew that was a bridge too far. you tell him no, mr. president, that is not how this works. and he thinks out loud. that is one ever his mannerisms. i think you saw a different group of advisers inside of the white house instead of saying mr. president, let s talk about that saying that is a great idea mr. president. you have folks like peter navarro and lin wood and rudy giuliani. and there was a large number of people, a large group of people yesterday who were willing to do this, if the president of the united states went on stage and said go march down the street and invade
mike pompeo, mcmill vaughny, the list of trump officials not cooperating is getting shorter by the day. it is getting much shorter and as you say that is an important sign that both probes, the house probe, which was debated for a long time about whether this would be significant and serious or not and then obviously a doj probe, so mess with that at your own peril. mulvaney saying he wants to tell the truth and that is acknowledging the legitimacy of the house probe and he wants engage in this. to the new york times, i would say really interesting reporting but it raises profound questions about whether the justice department or merrick garland has learned the wrong lessons. if they think how they do the probe and the facts will somehow move the audio chamber and the main propaganda arms of maga, i don t know that they ve learned any lessons. this is not a debate with william f. buckley where certain