That a businessman would have knowledge is limited in any when he is about to sign a transaction. But if you go after his integrity, right, if you go check. And by that he clearly meant after his public service, if you go after his military record, that President Trump was youre done. Thinking about or had in front but chuck, isnt there a high stakes problem with that, for of him the possibility of providing Security Assistance to trump and the republicans to say, because then the next question is, okay, who does know ukraine. It was similar to writing a check to someone who youre what trump said . Bolton and trump. About to send. He used that analogy very and they dont want those folks to come before congress. I absolutely agree. Im saying if there is a path to clearly to indicate that this try and point out that he has limited knowledge, thats the would be this would require path and its a narrow one. Something. If that person owed him does it ultimately work . No, it doesnt. Right.
and kent talking about how he s a third generation. george kent. serving now for 60 years. testified you were unaware that these are people who could make millions of dollars in the he served as a source for that private sector and instead they project. ambassador taylor, is that still correct? chose to serve their country and it is, sir. they re serving the cause of you said you did not know freedom in eastern europe. that ukrainian internal affairs and the national security of the minister avakov mocked and united states, which both disparaged then candidate trump on facebook and twitter, is that through democratic and republican administrations have determined that the national still correct? that is correct. security of the united states ambassador taylor, in your depends on promoting freedom testimony to this committee you throughout europe against said you were never briefed on russian aggression. these reports and statements, that you did not to due and we heard, i