question there is enough evidence for impeachment. one saying take more time, get more evidence. what do you think? i think that the reason why the republican witness jonathan turley was brought in today was really to create the impression that there is a sort of reasonable minds can disagree as to whether or not what we have seen described and really the uncontested facts at this point whether or not that constitutes an impeachable offense. that s just not the case. this is clearly you know, the conduct of the president of the united states is accused of, trading an official act for a personal benefit is a classic impeachable offense. i don t really think that this is something on which reasonable minds can differ. now, whether or not the evidence actually establishes that as sort of the appropriate remedy, that might be something that s prom appropriate to debate. but sort of the suggestion today that it s not clear whether or not whether this statutory elements of bribery ar