that they all agree toalo they n find the words, but the sentiment should be it s s unacceptable. it s not going to stand we ll take decisive, consequential action. all options are on the table and they were silentll on this issue. the second thing is, is what we ve been talking about is an opportunity to win. therefore a statement should have been made. we re going to double down on everything that president zelenskyy needs and we re going ev up and putpeed it it on . fast forward. we ve got to take advantage of the opportunity that s the lansky s army has provided . they have fought the russians to a standstill, butd. they canc keep that up without a steady supplyp of all the tools that they need is the leonskiky would not bey going and talkingd to every parliament in in nato and also outside of it if he wasn t desperate forpe more equipment, general doubtsra
interest of the american peoplen will are left early. willople it improve them or wilt actually make it worse? and i think that s really the center of our country needs to answer. you know, does the world we can t be the world s policeman . youwo and i agree on that part. we can t.t. yeah, however, we are a nation that has a conscience, a soulnd and a belief in natural law that rights come from god, not from government. so i think you agree with that part and when you see entire cities like mariupol decimated hospitals, bombed out maternity hospitals, schools bombed out indiscriminate bombing of innocent men, womenno and children and you see women and children shot dead, bombed out in the streetsd, and the cities of ukrainene. d does america at least have a moral obligation to assist a country that s willing to fight for itself to defendth
warning about the dangers ofny their dependency on russian energy. oh , wait,cy they were warned by president trump a few years back . you mighttrtr remember the enery is a much different. story than normal trade. d and you have a country likede poland that won t accept . e gas you take a look at some of the countries that won t accept it because they don t want to be captive t to russia and germany as far as i m concerned, is captive to russia because it s getting so much of its energy from russiais. so we re supposed to protect germany, but they re getting their energyfr from russia. explain that . you know, trump is right again. germany didid not heed that warning and now they are funding the bloodiest, most destructive war in modern wct european history. never underestimate germans. i the germanan germany s ability o screw up their own backyard. but today during a press conference in brussels, one german reporter wasn t interestede in asking a question about the war in his own cont
they re willing to fight for their country? they can t win this war.ountry sean, this is a real world that we live and it is not it s not strategically possible to think that ukraine is going tone beat russia i. if you look at it, all you re saying is what is when you fear vladimir putin like you re saying you fear vladimir putinla will use a nuke, he uses a nuke. the ready the radiation fallout will impact nato countries. that triggers article five . dodo you believe in article five of the nato agreement? i think that i think the most responsible thing that our leaders, the united states, leaders of nato, ukrainekr and russia need to do right now is look at what the reality is that we re facing on the ground and the reality that we want to be clearar and we might be able to negotiate an outcome to t this . okay, putin doesn t wanthe to a negotiate clearly doesn t want to negotiate. there s been many attempts at negotiation. so when you see images of dead
and her cronies and it s gotot b everything in that is necessary to prove the case. obstruction of justice, fraudha conspiracy, theft of trade secrets. the list goes on and on . and again, you know, i do hope that this lawsuit does proceed down in florida and federal court, of course, will be challenges to it, attempts toer dismiss people like comey will say, oh , i havele governmental immunity. now take a look at the recent u.s. supreme court decision a year and a half that says no if you violate somebody s individual rights and violateou the law in the process, no immunity. you know what , elena? i can t wait for discovery depositions. i hope we get to that point. do you think we ll get there? we re going to get there. we rehi going to get there. don t forget comey knew he was lying and then he still continued he had information from the cia c. he proceeded and they were all on the hillary clinton clinton campaign payroll. perkins coie with the dnc and hillary clinton s lawyer.