subpoenas like lolly pops, only on republicans, republican office holders and attorneys, crushing the constitution. what for? they are throwing a broad net trying to get trump, republicans, republican state legislatures caught up. i want to break it down with y you. this is your republic. let s focus on so-called fake electors. looking at language and constitution of the united states article 2, section 1, clause 2: that is the opening sentence. does not say the governor or the supreme court of the state or any court. doesn t say any board of elections or secretary of state. it says lore legislature. it represents the people best of any representative body. the state legislature. people have called this the independent legislature theory, which people? on the left who want their courts run by democrats to make decisions about election in the state, it could not be clear, you would not have a constitution today if the state legislature were not involved in making the decisio
dive? i think we need one. republican office holders and attorneys, crushing the constitution. what for? they are throwing a broad net trying to get trump, republicans, republican state legislatures caught up. i want to break it down with yo you. this is your republic. let s focus on so-called fake electors. looking at language and constitution of the united states article 2, section 1, clause 2: that is the opening sentence. does not say the governor or the supreme court of the state or any court. doesn t say any board of elections or secretary of state. it says lore legislature. it represents the people best of any representative body. the state legislature. people have called this the independent legislature theory, which people? on the left who want their courts run by democrats to make decisions about election in the state, it could not be clear, you would not have a constitution today if the state legislature were not involved in making the decisions about the appoint
in 1880 there was a book written by a big pro gre progressive thinker. it has always been who is in control of the money, the new found wealth, people had disposable income, we could ride ferris wheels for the first time and buy cotton candy for the first time and living in sky rising, it is always about control. none muc of them are economic experts, they don t care about that. their goal is different. centered around the world justice. always remember that. if you think in recent years you heard about racial justice, gender justice, now the new term environmental justice. this is a group that wants to redistribute wealth and fight in their minds the wrongs ofies yest
in 1880 there was a book written by a big pro g progressive thinker. it has always been who is in control of the money, the new found wealth, people had disposable income, we could ride ferris wheels for the first time and buy cotton candy for the first time and living in sky rising, it is always about control. none m of them are economic experts, they don t care about that. their goal is different. centered around the world justice. always remember that. if you think in recent years you heard about racial justice, gender justice, now the new term environmental justice. this is a group that wants to redistribute wealth and fight in their minds the wrongs ofie ye
supreme court, you saw the candidate who was backed by unions and progressives, and essentially democrats beat the candidate who was backed by scott walker, the nra and a lot of business interests. it was a clearly defined race. the interesting thing in wisconsin is over the last quarter century really, the republicans, the conservatives, have figured out how to win these races. they ve gotten very, very good at winning not just open seat races but occasionally beating an incumbent who s more progressive. so for scott walker this was supposed to be an easy one. instead last night was daf st e devastating. it wasn t that she won by 12 points, as you pointed out, it was that she won in a campaign that he clearly established herself as a more progressive