Constitution, our laws and the american way. There was one among the four, however, balanced, appealing to a higher level of conduct, jonathan turley, Constitutional Authority admitted he voted forward hillar for hillary cl. And he reasoned more to a higher standard than base partisanship. Impeachments have to be based on proof, not presumption. This would create a dangerous precedents for future impeachments. This would be the first impeachment in history where there would be considerable debate in my view, not compelling evidence of the commission of a crime. And secondly the abbreviated period of this investigation. Lou as the house dimms continued their drive to overthrow President Trump. He took time out from the nato summit meeting while he conducted the nations business in london. President trump think of it. They get three constitutional lawyers and we get one. Just that little statement. They get three, we get one. We had no representation. We couldnt call witnesses. We couldn
Constitution, our laws and the american way. There was one among the four, however, balanced, appealing to a higher level of conduct, jonathan turley, Constitutional Authority admitted he voted forward hillar for hillary cl. And he reasoned more to a higher standard than base partisanship. Impeachments have to be based on proof, not presumption. This would create a dangerous precedents for future impeachments. This would be the first impeachment in history where there would be considerable debate in my view, not compelling evidence of the commission of a crime. And secondly the abbreviated period of this investigation. Lou as the house dimms continued their drive to overthrow President Trump. He took time out from the nato summit meeting while he conducted the nations business in london. President trump think of it. They get three constitutional lawyers and we get one. Just that little statement. They get three, we get one. We had no representation. We couldnt call witnesses. We couldn
Believe now theres a reason its being withheld because im ballet theres a problem with it and what does have to say is that goes forward so anybody in the media anybody watching today the 1st you know 45 minutes is when we went through have painted a very interesting picture is painted an interesting picture that goes back many many years it paints a nation picture of picking and choosing which part of the last few weeks we want to talk about and thats fine because well have the rest of the day to go about this but professor turley youre now well rested. And youve got one question youre asking yes no on and not given to elaborate but i want to start here lets just do this. Elaborate if you would because you tried to on the question was asked to you and then if theres anything else that youve heard this morning that you would disagree with or how i am for soem i will go ahead and tell you some time to talk by the way just for the Information Mr but this is the coldest hearing room. In t
Even once exalting the constitution, our laws and the american way. There was one among the four, however, balanced, appealing to a higher level of conduct, jonathan turley, Constitutional Authority admitted he voted forward hillar for hillary cl. And he reasoned more to a higher standard than base partisanship. Impeachments have to be based on proof, not presumption. This would create a dangerous precedents for future impeachments. This would be the first impeachment in history where there would be considerable debate in my view, not compelling evidence of the commission of a crime. And secondly the abbreviated period of this investigation. Lou as the house dimms continued their drive to overthrow President Trump. He took time out from the nato summit meeting while he conducted the nations business in london. President trump think of it. They get three constitutional lawyers and we get one. Just that little statement. They get three, we get one. We had no representation. We couldnt ca
So it is important to keep that comparison in mind. Something more extensive on the National Security side than on the criminal side. I want to make that clear theres nothing special. You took a lot of my time. A brief question but a good question. Let me raise one last issue. The solicitor general, donald borrelia, assured the Supreme Court any criminal defendant who was being prosecuted losing evidence directly or indirectly through surveillance authorized by section 702 of the fisa amendment would receive notification of that fact. That kind of notice is essential, and the lawfulness of surveillance. And after mister borrelia made that representation. Is not informing, the defendants when surveillance was used to build a case against them. They have changed since then. Hope it is an easy one for you. The department of justice always in forms, the defendants in the case against them build on evidence gained through 702 surveillance. The standard in the statute is evident, obtained or