Qualified expert to weigh in on gj hypothetical past condition. Next[aqwqd slide please. First the screening analysis show the project was likely going to exceed the air district of ten excess cancers per million. Even if it wasnt an air pollution exposure zone given it is in such a zone, the cumulative affect adding the excess cancer risk caused by the project to the already elevated cancer risk is going to be a cumulative impact. All of the inputs protocols an out puts are in the file. He did it twice. Assuming that best why was still there and another assuming it wasnt. Next slide please. You have about two minutes left. Thank you. That just shows you the sources of emissions he looked at the parking lot. Loading dock and the street where the trucks are going to go leading up to that location. Next slide. Heres what he found. The health risk is significant even if you assume best buy is still there. He found output. 25 extra cancers beyond. You can see down here on farrell street th
Okay. Lets have the presentation. For the a your representative. Im here and i would like to share my screen if that is acceptable. Yes do you have access . Staff were making you a presenter as we speak. Thank you. Mad act clerk hes already a presenter. Im pressing a button and nothing is happening, buttcg7nwi believe that my presentation was submitted so i dont flownf its possible to we see it. There we go. So, so im just going to have to say next slide is that acceptable . Yes mr. Wolf we have a staff person who will advance the slides on your call. Okay. So, thank you very much i will assume the ten minutes is starting now. Good evening. Mr. President , supervisors my name is mark wolf imsykfg a lae attorney and im here to address this. Next slide. Next slide. Anybody . Whoops. Well try to move through these as quickly as i can given what appears to be the time lag. Exemption this is what. This is what you have to find in order to uphold the Planning Department determination. You ha
They didnt consider the tack emissions from the thousands of daily customer vehicle trips o identifies tax from Passenger Vehicles of significant sources of cancer risk in california and the only city wide health risk includes tax from gasoline power vehicles not just diesel trucks. More significantly as i inty mated a second ago, he pointed out that the applicants analysis assumes that best buy is still operating and there are still emissions from best buys delivery trucks, obviously in an effort to show that the relative contribution is pretty small. But again as we said under the guidelines you have to look at actual environmental conditions, those that exist at the time environmentally start not some hypothetical past condition. Next[aqwqd slide please. First the screening analysis show the project was likely going to exceed the air district of ten excess cancers per million. Even if it wasnt an air pollution exposure zone given it is in such a zone, the cumulative affect adding th
I am commissioner martha knutzen. This Commission Meeting is being conducted pursuant to the provisions of the bryant act and recent executive orders issued by the governor to facilitate teleconferencing to reduce the risk of covid19 transmission at public meetingful ordinarily, the brown act has strict rules for teleconferencing. The governors executive order has descended those rules. It requires that we continue to notice meetings in advance. The department has met all of the applicable notice requirements. As noted on the agenda, members of the public may observe this teleconference meeting via sfgov tv and may offer Public Comment by calling the published comment phone number. Id like to welcome the members of the public and staff who are watching us live on sfgov tv. The Commission Asks and thanks you for your patience during these unprecedented times. Conducting the meeting through teleconferencing has only happened once last month in our history. That being said, we hope the pu
We dont know how many Homeless Individuals actually participate in the program. Then in addition, you may have noticed on that chart, there are a number of departments, nine i believe, that showed no homeless participants whatsoever. A problem with some of the data is they dont provide any information on the residents of their parent pa their parent participants, so we dont know if there were homeless participants and they werent reported or if they didnt have any, anyway, but they dont fill in that data in their responses to the oewd annual inventory. As i mentioned, they dont have authority to compel the department to provide the data so it leaves a question and uncertainty about the actual level of participation of Homeless Individuals. Another factor, the last one here listed on this slide is that the homeless participants are counted in a different way than some of the other priority populations for Workforce Development services. Priority populations are identified in the five ye