And this is a case where i would want to see that happen, and we can talk to the City Attorney about how phase approvals work. I dont want it to just be an excavation project and they put a backhoe on it and thats it. I would want there to be the hearing is scheduled, unless there is a Serious Movement towards phase completion for the project. Commissioner johnson supervisor do i hear a second . Commissioner fong well, i make a motion. Are you adding that second . Commissioner johnson yes. Supervisor shall i call the question . Commissioner moore. Commissioner moore id like to make a general comment for the record. I believe the state density bonus law has flaws with it, and if you apply it equitably across the state of california which is experiencing growth, were never going to get where were trying to go, so i want to leave that sitting in the room here because there is something which needs to be considered at a deeper level regarding the particular provisions of that bond. Commiss
Thing id like to see, a. And secondly, if you decide to go ahead with this project. It should have a component of Affordable Housing, at least 33 . Weve got that from lennar from their project on 25th and south vanness, and i think you should do nothing less than that. Talk to the community and send it back to the developer. President hillis thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi name is is vincent chao. Im a retired prince and resident of the mission. You know, weve been dealing with so many homeless kids in this School District in the recent years, so when i hear that theyre building more housing in the mission, it was wonderful. Unfortunately, i just from what i just heard, its not going to be for those homeless kids, unfortunately. But in general, as an educator, and as a parent, i think its cruel and unusual punishment to subject little kids, two to five years old to a Major Construction right next to them for all these years. I mean, think of all the things they have to put up with.
President hillis gsh gsh apply not only to the base projects but to the affordable projects, and i think that works in San Francisco and other places. It doesnt necessarily work, so the state hasnt been able to pass that, but i think its an unfortunate quirk in the state law that were actually increasing density here and allowing for more units in the Affordable Housing percentage goes down. But its just an area we dont have any control. I mean, we can stand here and shake our fist at that one, but theres not much that we can do. I think this is a good location for housing. We should be building housing in the mission, we should be building housing in every corridor of the city. Im glad we just approved housing in geary, and i think we should be building housing in a district, especially adjacent to b. A. R. T. I agree with the i think the design has gone in a positive direction in kind of minimizing the impact on Mission Street. Unfortunately, that kind of pushes some of that mass to
One of the things we heard those that were separated during basic training one of the witnesses the or a slut or a lesbian rand i forget what the third one was. So we need to look at is whether or not it is feasible to integrate basic training and what they need to have the renovation so the women are trained some distance away so what that would be needed if we attempted to into the integration . And that is a good result in terms of finding a way to live together and Work Together and be respectful of each other. I yield back. Any other members wish to debate the amendment . The gentleman from colorado. So certainly to integrate so i oppose the amendment. Further discussion . In to the maximum extent possible and long before we go to congress with the challenges and rationale tarasco it will take in further the discussion. Questions on the amendment offered from the gentle lady from california . Those in favor . Oppose . The amendment is agreed to. The amendment says that the desk. T
Agents. With reduction of overall numbers. Do you anticipate a need to reexamine and restructure how the Border Patrolmans bases and Forward Operating bases . I share very much the concern we discussed on this hiring issue. For the Border Patrol to be in a downward spiral, which means were not able to hire as fast as attrition is very concerning. I have talked with your staff also about the number of programs that we put in place, particularly to speed up the process. So in these new hiring hubs we can get people through in 160 days until at times, well over a year. That is important. The close cooperation with the department of defense as people leave the department of defense and the active duty military to be able to hire them into the Border Patrol or into customs and Border Protection is particularly important. Working with congress for additional pay for very difficult locations where they work, hardship reimbursement would be particularly helpful. Along with things that weve dis