it will be quite a moment, though, will it not, when you have hannity, carlson, rupert murdoch, lachlan murdoch, potentially, up on the stand? well, the question is, what is it worth to the company for them not to be on the stand, right? and that has sort of been dominion s bet in this all along, which is the reputational harm, the damage that this would do and that the depositions,, of which i have been a part, and other things, that as they come out, that the pain that it would cause fox. so, for example, having tucker carlson on the record talking about how much he despises donald trump and how he just can t wait for him to go away, when he s saying one thing off camera and another thing on camera, that the damage that represents for fox in terms of. it s the same drive to cosset and flatter viewers that they were engaged in in the aftermath of the election. that goes straight to that same kind of profit motive. so there are balancing tests here.
alex jones is the same as th motives fox news is going to empty with that s what they had a profi motive to spread these lies. the emails and the communications indicate that after they call the election i arizona, they fast started losing audience, and tha caused panic within fox news they were losing ratings, they were losing their audience, an that s when the narrativ shifted for fox news, when the decided to choose thei audience and the profits tha that audience brings rathe then publishing the truth abou the election so just has an ex jones had profit motive for spring lie about sandy hook because i generate his audience, so di fox news, and that cross-examination is going t be compelling and because th jury is going to be wondering, why would they spread lies about something that everybody knew, and the answer is money. angelo, amid all this, yo have fox news airing a hour-long interview with forme president trump. do not worry to my viewers, i not going to show that video eve
as the motives that fox news i going to have to deal with and that is they had a profi motive to spread these lies. that the emails and th communications indicate, tha after they follow the election errors, they vastly starte losing audience. and that caused panic within fox news, they were losing ratings, they were losing thei core audience, and that is whe the narrative shifted for fo news, when they decided to choose their audience and th profits that that audience brings, rather than publishing the truth about the election and so, just as alex jones had a profit motive for spreadin false lies about sandy hoo because it generated his audience, so did fox news. and that cross-examination i going to be very compelling, because the jury is going to b wondering, why would the spread lies about somethin that everybody knew? and the answer is money. angelo, amid all of this, a fox news airing but don t worry, to my viewers, no even a clip of it the washington post put, it
case in your experience, what might be the strategy from dominion lawyers when they get fox news is high-profile host and executives on the stand? i think it s probably fai to say that alex jones is little bit of a unique personality on the stand and t cross examine. they re probably gonna b dealing with somewhat more sophisticated individuals, but the motives in the case agains alex jones are exactly the sam as the motives that fox news i going to have to deal with and that is that they had profit motive to spread thes lies the emails and communication and kate that after they calle the election in arizona, the fostered losing all and that s caused panic within fox news they re losing ratings, they were losing their audience, an that s when the narrativ shifted for fox news, wher they decided to choose their audience and the profits o that that audience bring rather than publishing the truth about the election so just as alex jones had profit motive for spreadin false lies about
contemplating suicide in the last three years. three out of five of these same young women were per sits tently depressed and hopeless we are a less religious sanction. we must get back to the values and parents and parents above all have to protect our children from these voices and activists that do not have best interest at heart. we don t know the pharmaceuticals if any being prescribed. we do know this, penny, gender reassignment surgery is big business. we just looked it up back at the office it s like 120 grand per surgery. is that a motivation here? these children are lifelong customers for pharma. there is so much profit motive for the medical professionals telling parents the false choice and it s a lie that parents have to choose between live transgender child and a dead