that president trump should be impeached apologizing now for invoking president trump s 13-year-old son s name during today s hearing after she faced attacks for doing so. here is pamela carlin s initial comments and then her apology towards the end of the hearing. contrary to what president trump has said article 2 does not give him the power to do anything he wants and i ll just give you one example that shows you the difference between him and a king. the constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the president can name his son bear know i can t make him a baron. i want to apologize for what i said earlier about the president s son. it was wrong of me to do that. i wish the president would apologize obviously, for the things that he s done that s wrong, but i do regret having said that. that came after karlan had faced from the trump campaign and melania trump, a minor child
trump of witness intimidation. now president trump did not tweet about karlan or any of the witnesses during their testimony today but first lady melania trump did tweet about a comment invoking the president s youngest son. she argued trump was wrong when he said article 2 of the constitution gives him the power to do anything he wants. he said one example of the difference is the constitution says no titles of mobility. so while the president can name his son barron he can t make him the barron. a minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public panderring and using a child to do it. late in the hearing after this tweet, karlan apologized for having mentioned the president s son. thank you very much. i appreciate that. let s bring in anna. thank you for joining us. good evening here. you tweeted today the women who have testified in the
oversight, intelligence committee have been investigating for quite a long period of time. financial services have been investigating. we ve just received a victory on the deutsche bank. no, i think the american people get it. 70% of the american people believe that what the president did was wrong. i asked that question in my questioning. i asked professor karlan whether or not the depth of our evidence was strong enough and whether or not it was wafer thin, which is what professor turley said. and absolutely not as i held up both the intelligence committee report and the mueller report, while hundreds of pages of documents are behind it. she said the circumstantial and real evidence is strong. we will continue to reinforce this information to the american people. we will not hide anything from them. i do think it s clear again, we are remaining open. we ve asked the president to participate. we ve invited the president to participate. his lawyers could have been there today. his la
disaster aid that congress has provided for? what would you think if that president said, i would like to you to do us a favor. i ll meet with you and i ll send the disaster relief once you brand my opponent a criminal. wouldn t you know in your gut that such a president had abused his office? if you con cluclude that as the evidence to this point shows that the president is soliciting foreign involvement in this election you need to act now to prevent foreign interference in the next election like the one we had in the past. before karlan it was fiona hill that turned heads. blasting the conspiracy theory the president and his allies continue to promote that ukraine interfered in the election. this is being perpetrated by the russian security forces themselves. she testified on what she viewed as an irregular second channel of policy for ukraine
denigrate. you gave money to barack obama and, you know, your mother dresses you funny. it s just like that s what they want to do. i think each of them executed on their strategies. scott, is that how you see it? your mother dresses you impeccably by the way. it s a recent development for me. number one, i thought turley was excellent today. i thought it was smart for the republicans to call a republican law professor who could say, look, i didn t vote for donald trump. i didn t even support him all the time. but this is why impeachment being rushed is wrong. i thought that was smart where as the democrats called three people who have been on this bandwagon for quite some time. number two, i thought professor karlan was particularly hurtful to the democrats today because i thought he was petty in some cases, a little snarky. number three, i don t think the ball really moved today. number four, based on what i ve heard from people in the white house and in the congress tonight, the